Guys,
I have uploaded a huge update on the QDT website. Not only does it
have details of the huge amount of progress done lately, but it has
updated screen shots, two User's Manuals (more to come), Errata notes
on the upcoming demo disk, etc.
Please take a look and give my your feedback if
Forgot to mention, any icon graphics submitted must be available for
free distribution with QDT releases and from the QDT website. If you
are borrowing the graphic from another source, you will need to point
me to notification that it is available for reuse, modification, and
distribution.
Rich Mellor wrote:
well that's one out of 3 I guess - presume you also get the high colour
mode (DISP_TYPE=33).
2 out of 4 now as I have no problem with it either am still only on 3.03
on the Q60. Yes Disp_type returns 33, just checked.
Also it might be a legacy in the other twos boot from
... and a prosperous new year for all the international QL community !!!
Javier Guerra
from Badajoz, Spain
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 11:49:59 +0100, Sinclair QL ES
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... and a prosperous new year for all the international QL community !!!
Javier Guerra
from Badajoz, Spain
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Same goes for me - lets hope everyone has a really good Christmas, and
comes back rfreshed in the new year, ready to take the QL forward that
little bit further...
With the release of QDT and internet ability for Q40/Q60 (and QPC2 I
believe), 2005 should be a good ywar
With that note (as I
I notice that Phoebus Dokos [EMAIL PROTECTED], on Friday 17 Dec 2004
20:48:19 -0500, suggested that consideration be given to a further reprint of
QL SuperBASIC by Jan Jones -
Sounds a good idea in principle, and I am quite willing to cause it to be
investigated; but until the likely order
Thu, 23 Dec 2004 12:28:31 -,() john mason
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /wrote:
I notice that Phoebus Dokos [EMAIL PROTECTED], on Friday 17 Dec
2004 20:48:19 -0500, suggested that consideration be given to a further
reprint of QL SuperBASIC by Jan Jones -
Sounds a good idea in principle, and I am
John
You are wrong.
Quanta does not own the copyright to the Jan Jones book and never has.
The agreement was that Quanta had permission to print additional
copies in return for a royalty based on the number printed and not on
the number sold.
Any other form of publication would require a new
Hi all,
is it just me or the Menu windows of the PE (not the regular windows) have
a corner of darker shadow on the lower right side?
If I am not seeing things that is probably because the bottom part of the
shadow extends more to the right than it should (and I am saying the
bottom part as
Phoebus Dokos wrote:
is it just me or the Menu windows of the PE (not the regular windows) have
a corner of darker shadow on the lower right side?
Yes, that can happen.
Marcel
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Thu, 23 Dec 2004 15:59:07 +0100,() Marcel Kilgus
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /wrote:
Phoebus Dokos wrote:
is it just me or the Menu windows of the PE (not the regular windows)
have
a corner of darker shadow on the lower right side?
Yes, that can happen.
Phew I thought I was blind (which is not far
Thu, 23 Dec 2004 14:46:19 +,() John Taylor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /wrote:
John
You are wrong.
Quanta does not own the copyright to the Jan Jones book and never has.
The agreement was that Quanta had permission to print additional
copies in return for a royalty based on the number
Thu, 23 Dec 2004 10:13:31 -0500,() Phoebus Dokos
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /wrote:
That's what I figured (the copyright matter) however all this doesn't
change the fact that the basis of reprinting on a one-off basis from a
on-demand printer is not feasible.
Of course here I meant : FEASIBLE ;-)
John Mason wrote:
I notice that Phoebus Dokos [EMAIL PROTECTED], on Friday 17
Dec 2004 20:48:19 -0500,
suggested that consideration be given to a further reprint of QL
SuperBASIC by Jan Jones -
Sounds a good idea in principle, and I am quite willing to cause it
to be investigated; but until
Phoebus Dokos wrote:
is it just me or the Menu windows of the PE (not the regular
windows) have a corner of darker shadow on the lower right side?
Yes, that can happen.
Phew I thought I was blind (which is not far from the truth anyway ;-))
for a sec
Well, after all it did take you over 2
Quanta is regarded by the taxman as a self trading company, that
is to say it trades solely for the
benefit of its members, and thus it is not liable for tax on its
earnings from sales to them.
Are Quanta actually allowed to sell to non-members in that case?
Assuming sales to non-members are
Thu, 23 Dec 2004 18:58:59 +,() John Taylor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /wrote:
Quanta is regarded by the taxman as a self trading company, that is
to say it trades solely for the
benefit of its members, and thus it is not liable for tax on its
earnings from sales to them.
Are Quanta actually
On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 18:58:59 +, John Taylor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quanta is regarded by the taxman as a self trading company, that is
to say it trades solely for the
benefit of its members, and thus it is not liable for tax on its
earnings from sales to them.
Are Quanta actually
Thu, 23 Dec 2004 20:07:31 +,() Malcolm Cadman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /wrote:
snip
Yet being a member of Quanta isn't that bad :-) ... a small subscription
a year helps to oils the wheels a bit.
Oh I understand, but the problem is that all I can see is a bit of...
ermmm... kind of
20 matches
Mail list logo
