Re: [Ql-Users] R: SMSQE 3.30

Wolf wrote: > this is the code for the baud command for the QXL (in the file > smsq_qxl_hdop_comm_asm): This code (qd_comm) is not used anywhere and even then it would only be the implementation for the highly machine specific sms.hdop. Baud is set using sms.comm. The trap is patched into the

[Ql-Users] R: SMSQE 3.30

Dear Wolfgang, It looks like, from tests done by Andrea Carpi on his QXL, the BAUD command is not linked anymore in the QXL version of SMSQ/E. Could you give a quick check? Thank you Kind regards Davide -Messaggio originale- Da: Ql-Users [mailto:ql-users-boun...@lists.q-v-d.com] Per

Re: [Ql-Users] R: SMSQE 3.30

Hi, this is the code for the baud command for the QXL (in the file smsq_qxl_hdop_comm_asm): ** ; QXL Comms baud rate set  1990 Tony Tebby QJUMP section sms xdefqd_comm xrefsms_rte include 'dev8_keys_err' qd_comm moveq

Re: [Ql-Users] R: SMSQE 3.30

Hi, Does he know with which version this happened the first time? Nothing has been changed there for quite some time, I'll try to check. Regards Wolfgang On 18/02/2017 10:50, d.santachi...@libero.it wrote: Dear Wolfgang, It looks like, from tests done by Andrea Carpi on his QXL, the BAUD

[Ql-Users] SMSQmulator 2.23

Hi, SMSQmulator 2.23 is out now, some small bug fixes nd it uses the latest smsqe. Have fun Wolfgang ___ QL-Users Mailing List

Re: [Ql-Users] R: SMSQE 3.30

From the SMSQ/E manual: -- BAUD The Baud rates supported by SMSQ/E on the QXL are 19200 9600 4800 2400 1200 600 300 If one of the ports is already committed to a mouse, the BAUD command will not affect it. BAUD 19200 set both ports to 19200 BAUD 2,1200 reset SER2 to 1200 baud

Re: [Ql-Users] R: SMSQE 3.30

Only on a side note and not really a problem: MT.BAUD (and the equivalent SMSQ/E trap) is documented to return "ERR.BP" on an unsupported baud rate. "BAUD 9700" on QPC does, however, return "not implemented" Tobias > Am 18.02.2017 um 11:23 schrieb Marcel Kilgus : >

Re: [Ql-Users] R: SMSQE 3.30

Il 18/02/2017 14.55, Tobias Fröschle ha scritto: Only on a side note and not really a problem: MT.BAUD (and the equivalent SMSQ/E trap) is documented to return "ERR.BP" on an unsupported baud rate. "BAUD 9700" on QPC does, however, return "not implemented" Tobias Yes, but on QXL any baud