Re: [Ql-Users] PRINT_USING bug

2017-02-12 Thread pjwitte
On 12/02/2017 21:13, Dilwyn Jones wrote: Yes - if you read the notes in the SBASIC / SuperBASIC Reference Manual, you will see that we also spotted this issue in various Toolkit II manuals... From memory it took me a while to work out the correct parameter! Thankfully, the SMSQ/E manual has

Re: [Ql-Users] PRINT_USING bug

2017-02-12 Thread Dilwyn Jones
Yes - if you read the notes in the SBASIC / SuperBASIC Reference Manual, you will see that we also spotted this issue in various Toolkit II manuals... From memory it took me a while to work out the correct parameter! Thankfully, the SMSQ/E manual has been correct at least (says he, breathing

Re: [Ql-Users] PRINT_USING bug

2017-02-12 Thread RWAP Software
On 2017-02-12 17:52, Dilwyn Jones wrote: I discovered a minor bug in SMSQ/E V 3.28's SBASIC today: In PRINT_USING the @ cancel character doesnt work as advertised. I know the danger of reporting something trivial like this is that someone will say "Ok, then fix it!" ;) It may (or may not) be

Re: [Ql-Users] PRINT_USING bug

2017-02-12 Thread Dilwyn Jones
I discovered a minor bug in SMSQ/E V 3.28's SBASIC today: In PRINT_USING the @ cancel character doesnt work as advertised. I know the danger of reporting something trivial like this is that someone will say "Ok, then fix it!" ;) It may (or may not) be trivial to fix, I havent got round to

Re: [Ql-Users] PRINT_USING bug

2017-02-12 Thread pjwitte
On 12/02/2017 17:43, RWAP Software wrote: On 2017-02-12 16:38, pjwitte wrote: I discovered a minor bug in SMSQ/E V 3.28's SBASIC today: In PRINT_USING the @ cancel character doesnt work as advertised. I know the danger of reporting something trivial like this is that someone will say "Ok, then

Re: [Ql-Users] PRINT_USING bug

2017-02-12 Thread RWAP Software
On 2017-02-12 16:38, pjwitte wrote: I discovered a minor bug in SMSQ/E V 3.28's SBASIC today: In PRINT_USING the @ cancel character doesnt work as advertised. I know the danger of reporting something trivial like this is that someone will say "Ok, then fix it!" ;) It may (or may not) be trivial