[ql-users] disagreement
On 22.05.2002 14:47:27, Richard Zidlicky wrote: Roy you are playing with fire. Everyone who goes into discussion with P. or C. Graf, is playing with fire! And I know what I'm talking about! You might consider beeing more careful, if the substance of your disagreement with Peter ever goes public it might be not very favourable for you. A threat remains a threat, even if packed in make-believe friendly words, Richard. What is it that you are crying for all these last weeks? I have learnt throughout the last years that P. and C. Graf have an unappeasable envy of Marcel Kilgus and attack and threaten everyone who - in their paranoid minds - sympathizes with him. Even if it was only from business aspects, the means they use, are far beyond from how healthy people discuss or even argue with each other. But you, what is your interest? Why are you so mistrusting, who in the QL-community has really cheated you so much that this is necessary? I am only a normal BASIC-programmer and still a convinced QL-fan. As far as I can understand the license, it could bring advantages and progress to all of us. Why is it that you only and purely see what could be wrong? Who are all those commercial developpers you always mention? Thus people who really can cope with the code of SMSQ? I only know very very few and they cannot even earn enough money with it to pay the visits of QL-shows! So, earnestly, what is this all about??? Wolfgang Uhlig
Re: [ql-users] disagreement
On Wed, 22 May 2002 19:34:55 +0200 Wolfgang Uhlig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 22.05.2002 14:47:27, Richard Zidlicky wrote: Roy you are playing with fire. Everyone who goes into discussion with P. or C. Graf, is playing with fire! And I know what I'm talking about! Everyone who throws dirt on me may experience that it bounces back. My patience is not endless. I have learnt throughout the last years that P. and C. Graf have an unappeasable envy of Marcel Kilgus and attack and threaten everyone who - in their paranoid minds - sympathizes with him. Even if it was only from business aspects, the means they use, are far beyond from how healthy people discuss or even argue with each other. I have learned during the last years that everyone who dares to have a different opinion than certain show-offs gets personally attacked (OK, he who has no arguments starts to attack persons, a well known phenomena) Wolfgang Uhlig Claus
Re: [ql-users] disagreement
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 07:34:55PM +0200, Wolfgang Uhlig wrote: On 22.05.2002 14:47:27, Richard Zidlicky wrote: Roy you are playing with fire. Everyone who goes into discussion with P. or C. Graf, is playing with fire! And I know what I'm talking about! You might consider beeing more careful, if the substance of your disagreement with Peter ever goes public it might be not very favourable for you. A threat remains a threat, even if packed in make-believe friendly words, Richard. What is it that you are crying for all these last weeks? I have learnt throughout the last years that P. and C. Graf have an unappeasable envy of Marcel Kilgus and attack and threaten everyone who - in their paranoid minds - sympathizes with him. Even if it was only from business aspects, the means they use, are far beyond from how healthy people discuss or even argue with each other. But you, what is your interest? Why are you so mistrusting, who in the QL-community has really cheated you so much that this is necessary? I am only a normal BASIC-programmer and still a convinced QL-fan. As far as I can understand the license, it could bring advantages and progress to all of us. Why is it that you only and purely see what could be wrong? Who are all those commercial developpers you always mention? Thus people who really can cope with the code of SMSQ? I only know very very few and they cannot even earn enough money with it to pay the visits of QL-shows! So, earnestly, what is this all about??? fine, try to fuel the fire if you have fun from it. Richard