On Thu, 2 Aug 2001, Derek Callaway wrote:
Hi, I'm having a problem with my qmail smtpd server becoming unresponsive
when rblsmtpd cannot communiate with the RBL nameservers. Has anyone else
From the manual page at http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp/rblsmtpd.html:
-C: (Default.) Handle RBL lookups
2) Did you actually pay MAPS for use of their mail-abuse.org
servers? They started charging on August 1st so you are
not going to have much luck using them to block spam if you
aren't paying them.
Have you looked at the price list? The price for individual users is
$0. If you want to keep
I list some alternatives to MAPS's RBLs, along with some other
spam-prevention techniques, here:
http://www.summersault.com/chris/techno/qmail/qmail-antispam.html
http://www.summersault.com/chris/techno/qmail/qmail-antispam.html#resources
Chris
On Thu, 2 Aug 2001, Derek Callaway wrote:
On
You will need to pay MAPS to use one of its three RBLs, or the combined
RBL+.
Please see http://www.mail-abuse.org/subscription.html and
http://www.mail-abuse.org/feestructure.html
even you are with an educational institution.
Dr. Dan Bernstein himself has given up on MAPS's RBLs:
On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 02:58:08PM -0400, Derek Callaway wrote:
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -u 7791 -g 2108 -v 0 smtp fixcrio
/usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd -t 7 /usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd -t 7 -r dialups.mail-abuse.org
/usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd -t 7 -r 'relays.mail-abuse.org:Open relay
Hi, I'm having a problem with my qmail smtpd server becoming unresponsive
when rblsmtpd cannot communiate with the RBL nameservers. Has anyone else
had this problem? I'd like to blindy accept e-mail if the RBL nameservers
cannot be contacted. Here's how I'm starting the SMTP server:
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2001 2:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: rblsmtpd and mail-abuse.org's DNS servers
Hi, I'm having a problem with my qmail smtpd server becoming unresponsive
when rblsmtpd cannot communiate with the RBL nameservers. Has anyone else
had this problem
On Thu, 2 Aug 2001, Chin Fang wrote:
Right, I guess I should have said that I already read those pages before I
posted this message. I'm looking for a _free_ workaround to this problem.
TIA
You will need to pay MAPS to use one of its three RBLs, or the combined
RBL+.
Please see
Hi, I'm having a problem with my qmail smtpd server becoming unresponsive
when rblsmtpd cannot communiate with the RBL nameservers.
http://www.mail-abuse.org/subscription.html
Mads
On Thu, 2 Aug 2001, Derek Callaway wrote:
Right, I guess I should have said that I already read those pages before I
posted this message. I'm looking for a _free_ workaround to this problem.
TIA
There is no workaround. The resolver is going to wait for the connection
to time out, thus
I've hit an odd problem with qmail-remote.
With one of our ISP's DNS servers set as primary, qmail-remote will hang
indefinitely on some addresses. The DNS server in question responds fine
to dig queries.
Example:
First DNS server in resolv.conf is 205.152.0.20
Run the following command
You avoid a second machine for internal/external DNS bu using BIND 9.1.x which
supports multiply view.
Jeff Sweeten
Sr. Internet Engineer
Aon
200 E Randolph
Chicago, Il 60601
Kourosh Ghassemieh [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 07/26/2001 02:21:43 PM
To: Gary MacKay [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL
You avoid a second machine for internal/external DNS bu using BIND
9.1.x which supports multiply view.
Jeff Sweeten
Sr. Internet Engineer
Aon
200 E Randolph
Chicago, Il 60601
Kourosh Ghassemieh [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 07/26/2001 02:21:43 PM
To: Gary MacKay [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL
I moved qmail off of a 'do it all' box to it's own box. It's running
great. My problem is that the old machine is still the DNS for my
domain. When it sends status messages to me, it, I'm guessing, checks
DNS and gets the public IP of the new box, can't connect to it from
behind the firewall
In a message dated Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 08:53:57AM -0400, Gary MacKay wrote:
I moved qmail off of a 'do it all' box to it's own box. It's running
great. My problem is that the old machine is still the DNS for my
domain. When it sends status messages to me, it, I'm guessing, checks
DNS
bind-9.1.0-10
Ricardo SIGNES wrote:
In a message dated Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 08:53:57AM -0400, Gary MacKay wrote:
I moved qmail off of a 'do it all' box to it's own box. It's running
great. My problem is that the old machine is still the DNS for my
domain. When it sends status messages
You need to run a separate DNS server for internal queries, that's how I
have my DNS set up. We use a separate DNS server for the internal
addresses and we don't have any problems. qmail ignores /etc/hosts,
it needs a DNS server.
At 12:22 PM 7/26/2001 -0400, you wrote:
bind-9.1.0-10
Ricardo
In a message dated Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 12:22:33PM -0400, Gary MacKay wrote:
bind-9.1.0-10
I that case, I have no advice. I only grok djbdns. :-(
--
rjbs
PGP signature
man 8 qmail-remote
Add your domain and 192 address to smtproutes and hup qmail.
% cat /var/qmail/control/smtproutes
your.domain.com:192.168.x.x
.your.domain.com:192.168.x.x
--
Mahlon Smith
InternetCDS
http://www.internetcds.com
On Thu, Jul 26, 2001, Gary MacKay wrote:
DNS and gets
Bingo Thanks that was a whole lot easier than setting up two dns
server, which is what I was in the process of doing when I got your
reply.
Thanks again,
Gary
Mahlon Smith wrote:
man 8 qmail-remote
Add your domain and 192 address to smtproutes and hup qmail.
% cat /var/qmail
Thank you for everybody.
I have succeeded. I have deleted all and install again, now it don't infor the
error
I am new with qmail.
I have a proplem with DNS bug. I have used DNS patch at
http://www.ckdhr.com/ckd/qmail-103.patch , but qmail still infor
CNAME_lookup_failed_temporarily when I send mail to hotmail.com's
email address.
Please help me.
Thank you very much
On Sun, Jul 22, 2001 at 06:57:58PM +0700, Vu Xuan Ngoc wrote:
I am new with qmail.
I have a proplem with DNS bug. I have used DNS patch at
http://www.ckdhr.com/ckd/qmail-103.patch , but qmail still infor
CNAME_lookup_failed_temporarily when I send mail to hotmail.com's
email address
Greg White wrote:
On Sun, Jul 22, 2001 at 06:57:58PM +0700, Vu Xuan
Ngoc wrote:
> I am new with qmail.
>
> I have a proplem with DNS bug. I have used DNS patch at
> http://www.ckdhr.com/ckd/qmail-103.patch
, but qmail still infor
> "CNAME_lookup_failed_temporari
For whatever it is worth:
I started having the same problem with hotmail on Friday (could have
started before then, but I know it was happening Friday), I am running the
latest qmail-ldap (which has the dns patch). I have sent email to hotmail
from the same box in the past. I sent some email
thought my ISP would be sensitive to RIPE.
Thanks for all of the feedback.
From: Andreas Grip [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Reverse DNS lookups
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 15:44:36 +0200
I had problems to get my ISP to setup reverse DNS on my IP:s but then I
turned to RIPE
pop corn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2) If they don't add reverse PTR records for my virtual domains, I've
been debating telling the Internic to change my DNS servers for the
virtual domains to the base address of my own dedicated server. It's
not as if my virtual domains are subdomains of my
On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 06:07:59AM -, pop corn wrote:
Their staff initially said 1) reverse PTR records were never necessary;
Hell. Did you really say they call themselves an ISP? Uh-oh.
--
* Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de *
* Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg,
Wrong mailing list, my apologies, I meant to send this to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: pop corn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Reverse DNS lookups
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 06:07:59 -
I'm dealing with a new ISP that has been pretty much ok until this problem.
I realized
I had problems to get my ISP to setup reverse DNS on my IP:s but then I
turned to RIPE and they sended an e-mail to my ISP. The day after that
the reverse was working :-)
So maybe you should try go through RIPE...
Andreas
This was the best advice!
I emailed RIPE and cc'd my ISP, then called my ISP to make sure they saw my
email to RIPE. My ISP just emailed me to say that my PTR records would be
put on their DNS servers tonight at midnight. I don't know if RIPE emailed
them, but I think my ISP didn't want
Hello
i added another MX record for my domain where and what i should add into
qmail in order for qmail to act as a backup?
Thanks in advance
On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 08:37:12PM -0400, alexus wrote:
Hello
i added another MX record for my domain where and what i should add into
qmail in order for qmail to act as a backup?
Put the domain(s) in question into /var/qmail/rcpthosts and nowhere else as
you could have read in the archives
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2001 8:45 PM
Subject: Re: MX record in DNS and Qmail
On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 08:37:12PM -0400, alexus wrote:
Hello
i added another MX record for my domain where and what i should add into
qmail in order for qmail to act as a backup?
Put
Hi:
I'm new 2 qmail. i've install it, run it, and love it.
as a code builder and synth programer i've
learn that the modular approach it's always
the way 2 go.
I have some teknical questions that are
clearly DNS related
is it o.k if i post those questions here?
or does somebody knows about
that are
clearly DNS related
is it o.k if i post those questions here?
or does somebody knows about a good DNS mailing
list?
I think you should post those to the cr.yp.to DNS list, which is found at
this server. Send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Otherwise, I'll be happy to help if you email me
hi there,
had followed Life With Qmail and setup qmail without dns. Was working
fine since last month. But now when users in our lan use my qmail server with
my ip addr in their mua's it delays for quite a long time and sometimes hangs
or goes to the out box. and when I use it from
ridhwan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But now when users in our lan use my qmail server with
my ip addr in their mua's it delays for quite a long time and sometimes hangs
or goes to the out box. and when I use it from the server itself it takes
atleast 30 seconds to queue the mail.
FAQ, FAQ,
without dns
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 16:11:34 +0530
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
hi there,
had followed Life With Qmail and setup qmail without dns. Was working
fine since last month. But now when users in our lan use my qmail
server withmy ip addr in their mua's it delays for quite
I have been running qmail for about 8 months, It works great.
So far I have not been able to resolve on problem.
When an smtp connection comes in we only want to connect
with servers who have forward and reverse DNS that match.
I managed to install a macro into sendmail (mail server we replaced
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 06:30:44AM -, David Killingsworth wrote:
I have been running qmail for about 8 months, It works great.
So far I have not been able to resolve on problem.
When an smtp connection comes in we only want to connect
with servers who have forward and reverse DNS
been running qmail for about 8 months, It works great.
So far I have not been able to resolve on problem.
When an smtp connection comes in we only want to connect
with servers who have forward and reverse DNS that match.
I allready anwered your question in alt.comp.mail.qmail some days ago
, May 14, 2001 at 06:30:44AM -, David Killingsworth wrote:
I have been running qmail for about 8 months, It works great.
So far I have not been able to resolve on problem.
When an smtp connection comes in we only want to connect
with servers who have forward and reverse DNS that match
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 10:10:21AM -, David Killingsworth wrote:
Shouldn't tcpserver drop the connection when $TCPREMOTEIP is DNS'd to
a hostname and $TCPREMOTEHOST is DNS'd to an IP. if $TCPREMOTEIP can't
be resolved or if $TCPREMOTEHOST can't be resolved, shouldn't this cause
a
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 12:35:32PM +, Mark Delany wrote:
=.:allow
:deny
Close. To achieve this, the tcp.smtp file should actually contain:
=:allow
:deny
I just experimented with both forms. With the dot, nothing matched,
including hosts with good forward/reverse resolvability.
Hi ALL,
I'm tring deliver messages localy thru qmail (smtp)
and I have no DNS services configured at this time. It's not working and I read
somewhere that qmail need DNS. My question is, even if for local domains
?
Can you please send me indications with more detail
about how create
Hello,I wonder if in my case could I get enhancements with qmail,
installing a DNS (also just a cached DNS) into my linux server.
Please consider that:
I'have not a registered FQDN,my IP on the INTERNET is dynamic,
I have only few machines into my LAN with their private hostnames
and relative
-Original Message-
From: David T. Ashley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 6:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: DNS question
I read the HOWTO for q-mail, but there is one thing I don't understand.
It states that I need a DNS and that my machines have
firewall) is 192.168.0.33. Clearly, trying to reverse-DNS the latter will
lead to trouble, whereas the former is OK.
You are using NAT - if you only want to send email from your internal
network to the world and get your mails by "polling" it somehow you get no
problem (except
Hi,
I got the following error when I use the oversize dns patch file.
My command is : patch -p0 /usr/local/src/patchfile.
the error are as follow:
patching file 'qmail-1.03/dns.c'
Hunk #1 failed at 21.
Hunk #2 failed at 47.
Hunk #3 failed at 83.
Please reply directly to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi,
I got the following error when I use the oversize dns patch file.
My command is : patch -p0 /usr/local/src/patchfile.
the error are as follow:
patching file 'qmail-1.03/dns.c'
Hunk #1 failed at 21.
Hunk #2 failed at 47.
Hunk #3 failed at 83.
Please reply directly to [EMAIL PROTECTED
I got it too. I still do not know why.. Hope someone responds.
Kirt
-Original Message-
From: Mark Lo (Home Net) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 1:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: patch file error for oversize dns
Hi,
I got the following error when I use
When I follow the config command to configure the
qmail, it's say something like this :
./configYour hostname is sanfransisco.hard
errorSorry, I couldn't find your host's canonical name in DNS.You will
have to set up control/me yourself.
And here's is my DNS setting :
$TTL
why don't you try adding sanfransisco to your DNS file? (i.e. sanfransisco
IN A192.168.1.1)
Esteban Javier Prspero
-Original Message-
From: Essy Ren [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 8:13 AM
To: qmail
Subject: canonical name in DNS
When I follow
couldn't find your host's canonical name in DNS.
You will have to set up control/me yourself.
And here's is my DNS setting :
$TTL 86400
erakarsa.local. IN SOA sanfransisco.erakarsa.local. essy.erakarsa.local. (
1 ; Serial
10800 ; Refresh after 3
There's a failure notice send to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
like this :
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at
sanfransisco.erakarsa.local.I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message
to the following addresses.This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry
it didn't work out.[EMAIL
Do you have an mx record setup for the erakarsa.local domain?
You can find out by issuing either of the following (where
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx is the ip of your dns server):
djbdns way:
dnsq mx erakarsa.local xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
dig way (bind tool):
dig erakarsa.local mx
Hi,
I've been setting up a mail server and I've run into a bit of a strange
problem.
The mail server is for "eeng.may.ie" and it receives mails fine except
those from "may.ie".
If I try and send mails from my machine through Outlook using smtp, it says
it cannot find the domain, yet when I log
Charles Cazabon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John Conover [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a matter of policy, is it reasonable to reject messages that fail a
reverse DNS lookup on HELO's FQDN/authentication?
Very political question. As long as you don't reject envelope senders
Jenny Holmberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a matter of policy, is it reasonable to reject messages that fail a
reverse DNS lookup on HELO's FQDN/authentication?
Very political question. As long as you don't reject envelope senders of
and #@[], you won't be violating any RFCs
MUST NOT refuse to accept a message, even if the
sender's HELO command fails verification.
Interesting; I have never agreed with refusing email based on the DNS
of the HELO or envelope sender, but didn't realize that (at least for HELO)
it was actually verboten.
In real life
Erwin Hoffmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
However, it makes sense to do DNS lookup f=FCr the MAIL FROM: address.=20
If you have reliable DNS services - I've been on the other end of
that, a site permanently rejecting each mail (a 5xx code) because they
were having problems resolving the sending
Hi,
At 09:49 7.3.2001 +, James R Grinter wrote:
Erwin Hoffmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
However, it makes sense to do DNS lookup f=FCr the MAIL FROM: address.=20
If you have reliable DNS services - I've been on the other end of
that, a site permanently rejecting each mail (a 5xx code
y messages
would have been refused by such a policy, vs. how many should have
been refused.
Thanks to all for the opinions,
John
Erwin Hoffmann writes:
Hi,
At 09:49 7.3.2001 +, James R Grinter wrote:
Erwin Hoffmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
However, it makes sense to do DN
Erwin Hoffmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
I dont know, whether the HELO/EHLO from the MTA-Client means anything and
whether it can be used for a reverse DNS lookup.
However, it makes sense to do DNS lookup fr the MAIL FROM: address.
This is alrady feasable by some qmail patches
is not connected to our isp it's really, really fast.
i have included the -H -R options in tcpserver. i have found that if i
remove any entries from dns (the dns entries in there were the addesses of
our isp's dns servers) this problem no longer persists, but when issuing the
etrn command we cannot specify
As a matter of policy, is it reasonable to reject messages that fail a
reverse DNS lookup on HELO's FQDN/authentication?
Good idea?
Fascist idea?
Opinions pls.
John
--
John ConoverTel. 408.370.2688 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
631 Lamont Ct. Cel. 408.772.7733 http
John Conover [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a matter of policy, is it reasonable to reject messages that fail a
reverse DNS lookup on HELO's FQDN/authentication?
Very political question. As long as you don't reject envelope senders of
and #@[], you won't be violating any RFCs. However, you
On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 10:07:46AM -,
John Conover [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a matter of policy, is it reasonable to reject messages that fail a
reverse DNS lookup on HELO's FQDN/authentication?
I don't think this buys you much in the way of spam protection and can
block legitimate
John Conover [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As a matter of policy, is it reasonable to reject messages that fail a
reverse DNS lookup on HELO's FQDN/authentication?
Good idea?
Fascist idea?
Opinions pls.
Do you relay for users running POP clients who send their outbound
through you via
John Conover writes:
As a matter of policy, is it reasonable to reject messages that fail a
reverse DNS lookup on HELO's FQDN/authentication?
No.
Neither is it reasonable to reject messages from a host whose reverse
DNS hostname lacks an MX record.
Neither is it reasonable to reject
John Conover writes:
As a matter of policy, is it reasonable to reject messages that fail a
reverse DNS lookup on HELO's FQDN/authentication?
No.
Indeed. Nevertheless, I think some elaboration will make the following
answers easier to understand to less experienced mail managers
At 10:07 AM 06-03-2001 -, John Conover wrote:
As a matter of policy, is it reasonable to reject messages that fail a
reverse DNS lookup on HELO's FQDN/authentication?
Well two of our service providers haven't arranged reverse DNS lookups for
our Internet visible subnets. Our DNS servers
At 10:07 AM 06-03-2001 -, John Conover wrote:
As a matter of policy, is it reasonable to reject messages that fail a
reverse DNS lookup on HELO's FQDN/authentication?
Well two of our service providers haven't arranged reverse DNS lookups for
our Internet visible subnets. Our DNS
Hi,
I dont know, whether the HELO/EHLO from the MTA-Client means anything and
whether it can be used for a reverse DNS lookup.
However, it makes sense to do DNS lookup fr the MAIL FROM: address.
This is alrady feasable by some qmail patches, including my SPAMCONTROL.
Have a look at:
http
Yesbut, then the buffer takes 64K *every* time.
It's not nearly that bad in practice. Thanks to the magic of demand
paging, most of that space (uninitialized .bss, recall) is never touched,
never paged in or out. Making the response array that size will probably
cause one extra page to be
Hi, All,
I have a mail server frame named
mail.xyz.com, and I want to set up a
mail system with such address [EMAIL PROTECTED], butIcanonly
get
[EMAIL PROTECTED], it is all right to
send and receive email with it.
how can I set up with @xyz.com ???
I patched DNS with qmail-103
Jeremy Suo-Anttila writes:
all you need to do to fix the dns problem is change a setting in your dns.c
source for qmail change the word "PACKETZ" to "65536"
this is according to running Qmail by sams publishing.
Yesbut, then the buffer takes 64K *every* time. Just
For several days, I have attempted to download the patch that is
at http://www.ckdhr.com/ckd/qmail-103.patch but the server www.ckdhr.com
has not been responding at all.
Is this patch available from any other locations or mirror sites?
--
John Evans
or mirror sites?
I have a copy of it at http://flounder.net/qmail/qmail-dns-patch
--Adam
--
Adam McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED] | "No matter how much it changes,
http://flounder.net/publickey.html | technology's just a bunch of wires
GPG: 17A4 11F7 5E7E C2E7 08AA| connected to a
all you need to do to fix the dns problem is change a setting in your dns.c
source for qmail change the word "PACKETZ" to "65536"
this is according to running Qmail by sams publishing.
i have hacked this code a few times with 0 problems on 5 of my servers
thanks
Jps
Hi all,
is there an remarkable performance improvement, if the mailserver has a
local DNS cache (instead of contacting a external nameserver)?
Best regards,
Marcus
--
Sent through GMX FreeMail - http://www.gmx.net
Marcus Korte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is there an remarkable performance improvement, if the mailserver has a
local DNS cache (instead of contacting a external nameserver)?
Potentially. If your current nameserver is not very fast and you
switch to a local dnscache that's properly configured
Just in case anyone is interested...
I have made a patch to support two features I sorely missed in ofmipd - DNS
envelope sender checking, and databytes size limiting.
I have adapted Nagy Balazs' DNS mfcheck patch to work with ofmipd, and
added qmail's databytes checking mechanism.
If anyone
Hello,
Sorry to bring this to the list, as I'm sure that instructions for this
are posted *somewhere*, but I can seem to find them.
We are running Qmail with tcpserver, and would like to duplicate the
sendmail feature of denying connections from mail servers which do not
have DNS setup
there is a list archive for BIND/DNS at:
http://www.isc.org/ml-archives/bind-users/
ALso on there you can join the list, which is a crossover to the newsgroup:
comp.protocols.dns.bind (i think that is what it's called).
As for the MX record. The MX record is what tells the world to send mail
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 05:15:25AM +, Andrew Alford wrote:
Is it necessary, even if you can ping on the internet your "mail.xyz.com
or smtp.xyz.com", to have your mx server listed with your registrar?
That depends. If your mail addresses are of the form [EMAIL PROTECTED], you will
need
Is it necessary, even if you can ping on the internet your "mail.xyz.com
or smtp.xyz.com", to have your mx server listed with your registrar?
ven't done a true test if you don't ping from
outside your intranet.
What it comes down to, does the outside see those addresses. If the
outside can then it's not "necessary". On the other hand, when you
register your name with ICANN, you are required to provide 2 DNS
servers you can be
I have a bunch of my mail stuck in the queue to vickers-systems.com
I am 95% sure its an error on their end, but I don't want to contact them
until I am 100% sure.
Can anyone help me out to solve why I cannot send mail to them?
Thanks,
Tim Hunter -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SysAdmin -- CIMx
Tim Hunter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a bunch of my mail stuck in the queue to vickers-systems.com
I am 95% sure its an error on their end, but I don't want to contact them
until I am 100% sure.
Can anyone help me out to solve why I cannot send mail to them?
What Do The Logs
On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 02:07:44PM -0500, Tim Hunter wrote:
I have a bunch of my mail stuck in the queue to vickers-systems.com
As Charles said: look at the logs. That's what they are for.
You will probably see "cannot connect" errors, as:
dig mx vickers-systems.com - no MX records
dig a
Hello
Sorry to ask this but I couldn't find an answer in LWQ or FAQs...
how do I determine qmail not to perform dns lookups for incoming pop3 clients?
They get huge timeouts
Thanks
--
Stefan Laudat
http://www.pepsicola.ro/~stefan
---
Two sure ways to tell a sexy
Stefan Laudat [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes on 8 December 2000 at 22:12:48 +0200
Hello
Sorry to ask this but I couldn't find an answer in LWQ or FAQs...
how do I determine qmail not to perform dns lookups for incoming pop3 clients?
They get huge timeouts
If you're running qmail-popup
Russell Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes on 10 November 2000 at 16:31:26 -0500
Eric Wang writes:
Do I still need the Oversize DNS Patch?
No.
why don't need anymore?
Because AOL realized their mistake. Not even AOL can get away with
DNS replies larger than 512 bytes
On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 01:58:48PM -0600, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
Russell Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes on 10 November 2000 at 16:31:26 -0500
Eric Wang writes:
Do I still need the Oversize DNS Patch?
No.
why don't need anymore?
Because AOL realized their mistake
why don't need anymore?
On Wed, 8 Nov 2000 22:06:17 -0500 (EST)
Russell Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Lo writes:
Hi,
Do I still need the Oversize DNS Patch?
No.
--
-russ nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://russnelson.com
Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok
Eric Wang writes:
Do I still need the Oversize DNS Patch?
No.
why don't need anymore?
Because AOL realized their mistake. Not even AOL can get away with
DNS replies larger than 512 bytes.
--
-russ nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://russnelson.com
Crynwr sells support for free software
Hi,
I would like to know that Do I still need the Oversize DNS Patch from
now on.
Thank you so much,
Mark Lo
but when i try to send to [EMAIL PROTECTED] from
another machine it bounces back to me??? i realize this is a dns
problem but i've been trying for 2 weeks and i've run out of ideas... i
tried setting resolv.conf to
nameserver 127.0.0.1
nameserver blkft.com
but when the machine rebooted because
1 - 100 of 336 matches
Mail list logo
