Thanks A M,
I am about to update and testing new 64 bit but got
this error while connecting via Thunderbird and also
Outlook Express that i think it is because of 64
version, but also i could connect via Nokia S60 series
telephone and send email and could get it in other
account.
Thunderbird
Greetings,
I have released an updated squirrelmail package. This is available for
download on the devel site, http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/
Thanks,
Erik
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
bb. wrote:
Thanks A M,
I am about to update and testing new 64 bit but got
this error while connecting via Thunderbird and also
Outlook Express that i think it is because of 64
version, but also i could connect via Nokia S60 series
telephone and send email and could get it in other
account.
slamp slamp wrote:
quick question, does the standard port 25 in qmailtoaster
support/requires authentication? i know port 587 requires
authentication.
yes it support authentication but not requires it (depend on tcp.smtp
configuration)
so if i add my local network in tcp.smtp, i should be
It happened while the server is NOT loaded so it must
be ok as default (If not, let the developers please
correct)
I have not seen any error on 32 bit before while using
for ~2 years.
Maybe 64 bit is not tested much? I beleive it would be
feelable faster and want to use it (In future)
My
port 25 doesn't require but accepts authentication.
That means if youre not in tcprules then you need to auth. If you are ,
you don't need to auth and can relay as you just asked.
slamp slamp wrote:
quick question, does the standard port 25 in qmailtoaster
support/requires authentication? i
I am using Qmailtoaster on CentOS 4.4 64bit for production for 6 months
already without problem.
the problem you said before (I think) is specific only to CentOS 5.0
64bit only
bb. wrote:
It happened while the server is NOT loaded so it must
be ok as default (If not, let the developers please
We have it running on several OpenSuSE 10.2 64bit machines for a while. Before we had used it on SuSE 10.0 and OSS 10.1 machines each 64bit without any problems.
Did you increase the softlimits for all services which have softlimit defined
as sugested before? This is the only issue I have had
Hi,
2007/10/2, bb. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thanks A M,
I am about to update and testing new 64 bit but got
this error while connecting via Thunderbird and also
Outlook Express that i think it is because of 64
version, but also i could connect via Nokia S60 series
telephone and send email and
So,
Can you give an example please? Like: while your 32
bit server processes thosands of emails an hour and
the queue was long, after 64 bit install it was
faster, is it so?
By the way, CentOS 5.0 wiki still says add domainkeys
but at somewhere else do not run domainkeys until a
fix would be,
thanks everyone for the clarification.
On 10/2/07, Janno Sannik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
port 25 doesn't require but accepts authentication.
That means if youre not in tcprules then you need to auth. If you are ,
you don't need to auth and can relay as you just asked.
slamp slamp wrote:
I have a couple of problems that had shown up about a month ago and now
are showing up again yesterday and today in our domain. Many of my
users are reporting quite a few duplicate emails and many are receiving
a great number of spam emails that they were not receiving before.
We are running
More information: Below are a few lines from the
/var/log/qmail/spamd/current file. This information does not look good
but I do not know what it means. Can someone give me some idea of what
this means and what I should be looking at?
@4000470285c9110f939c [19049] warn: prefork: select
ok, I got access to one of the emails with the original headers, and it had:
*Return-Path:* [EMAIL
PROTECTED]https://smtp.polymetmining.com/webmail/src/compose.php?send_to=JSwanson%40veitusa.com
*Delivered-To:*
[EMAIL
The only x's I put in was over the one IP address. Other than that, it is
as is sent.
dnk
On 10/2/07, Jake Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dnk wrote:
ok, I got access to one of the emails with the original headers, and it
had:
*Return-Path:* [EMAIL
Are you using spamdyke? I received several reports of this behavior
with remote servers running Microsoft Windows. The latest version
(3.0.1) fixes this problem.
-- Sam Clippinger
dnk wrote:
The only x's I put in was over the one IP address. Other than that, it
is as is sent.
dnk
On
Hello All,
I seem to have gotten hit by some kind of attack and am trying to figure out
how to stop it.
I have over 14,000 emails that are going to yahoo.com.tw email addresses.
Any Idea how i can get this stopped?
Thanks
q
What do the logs look like?
On 10/2/07, Kyle Quillen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello All,
I seem to have gotten hit by some kind of attack and am trying to figure out
how to stop it.
I have over 14,000 emails that are going to yahoo.com.tw email addresses.
Any Idea how i can get this
Well I think I found out where these came from. One of my customers setup a
microsoft server that is an open relay and it was relaying mail through me.
I shut them down but I have a feeling it is going to take a while for these
emails to flush out of the queue.
Or i could just clear the queue
You could use qmHandle to remove them based on source or destination.
I believe it is a part of the qmailtoaster-plus suite.
You could also use MAXCONNIP=3 or some sane limit in tcp.smtp to
prevent flooding on a regular basis. It should, at the very minimum,
throttle how many times a
well the qmHandle is working but when I run through and delete messages i
get the following error when i run a qmailctl start
supervise: fatal: unable to acquire send/supervise/lock: temporary failure
supervise: fatal: unable to acquire send/supervise/lock: temporary failure
Not sure what that
Whoops, should have mentioned that you had to shut down qmail first,
then start it back up.
Before you start things back up make sure you kill all qmail deamons,
such as qmail-send or qmail-smtpd.
Erik
On 10/2/07, Kyle Quillen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
well the qmHandle is working but when I
OK Got that now i can do that
what should be the string that I use to delete all those messages in queue.
i am using the command
qmHandle -sf '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
do i need to lose the quotes?
thanks
q
On 10/2/07, Erik A. Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whoops, should have mentioned
23 matches
Mail list logo
