Re: [qmailtoaster] qmail-spp

2007-06-25 Thread PakOgah
Mark Samples wrote: Greetings, Has anyone on this list had experience utilizing the qmail-spp setup? If so, would you care to share your experience(s)? qmail-spp seems has a lot of plugins. but I am afraid those plugins overlapping with current qt features likeauthrequired : Forces

[qmailtoaster] Qmail SPP

2007-03-07 Thread Buzzz
Hi Is it possibile to apply the spp patch (http://qmail-spp.sourceforge.net/doc/) with the qmailtoaster patches ? Spp appears to be a good framework to implement anti-spam checks . Thx in advance, Davide - QmailToaster

Re: [qmailtoaster] Qmail SPP

2007-03-07 Thread Eric \Shubes\
Buzzz wrote: Hi Is it possibile to apply the spp patch (http://qmail-spp.sourceforge.net/doc/) with the qmailtoaster patches ? Spp appears to be a good framework to implement anti-spam checks . Thx in advance, Davide I don't know for sure, but I doubt it. While it appears to be

RE: [qmailtoaster] Qmail SPP

2007-03-07 Thread David Sánchez Martín
: [qmailtoaster] Qmail SPP Hi Is it possibile to apply the spp patch (http://qmail-spp.sourceforge.net/doc/) with the qmailtoaster patches ? Spp appears to be a good framework to implement anti-spam checks . Thx in advance, Davide

Re: [qmailtoaster] Qmail SPP

2007-03-07 Thread Buzzz
I don't know for sure, but I doubt it. While it appears to be a flexible framework, the overall effectiveness is only as good as the plugins. The plugins I see listed provide capabilities that are already in the toaster. Is there something specific you'd like to use that the toaster doesn't

Re: [qmailtoaster] Qmail SPP

2007-03-07 Thread Eric \Shubes\
Buzzz wrote: I don't know for sure, but I doubt it. While it appears to be a flexible framework, the overall effectiveness is only as good as the plugins. The plugins I see listed provide capabilities that are already in the toaster. Is there something specific you'd like to use that the

RE: [qmailtoaster] Qmail SPP

2007-03-07 Thread David Sánchez Martín
-list@qmailtoaster.com Asunto: Re: [qmailtoaster] Qmail SPP I don't know for sure, but I doubt it. While it appears to be a flexible framework, the overall effectiveness is only as good as the plugins. The plugins I see listed provide capabilities that are already in the toaster

Re: [qmailtoaster] Qmail SPP

2007-03-07 Thread Erik A. Espinoza
: [qmailtoaster] Qmail SPP I don't know for sure, but I doubt it. While it appears to be a flexible framework, the overall effectiveness is only as good as the plugins. The plugins I see listed provide capabilities that are already in the toaster. Is there something specific you'd like to use