On 12/06/2013 10:44 AM, Bryan Hanson wrote:
[previously posted on Stack Overflow:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/17034309/hiding-undocumented-functions-in-a-package-use-of-function-name
]
I've got some functions I need to make available in a package, and I don't want
to export them or
Thanks Duncan...
Silly me, it's section 1.6.1 not version 1.6.1!
So this warning from check is not a problem in the long run:
* checking for missing documentation entries ... WARNING
Undocumented code objects:
‘ang0to2pi’ ‘dAB’ ‘doBoxesIntersect’ ...
All user-level objects in a package should
On 13/06/13 03:34, Bryan Hanson wrote:
SNIP
So this warning from check is not a problem in the long run:
* checking for missing documentation entries ... WARNING
Undocumented code objects:
‘ang0to2pi’ ‘dAB’ ‘doBoxesIntersect’ ...
All user-level objects in a package should have
On Jun 12, 2013, at 16:34, Bryan Hanson han...@depauw.edu wrote:
Thanks Duncan...
Silly me, it's section 1.6.1 not version 1.6.1!
So this warning from check is not a problem in the long run:
* checking for missing documentation entries ... WARNING
Undocumented code objects:
Hi Rolf... Thanks. I discovered the approach you described by looking at the
source for spatstat, which as it turns out does exactly that. I also
discovered by testing that if you don't export a pattern, but rather export the
specific names, not including the functions one wants to hide,
5 matches
Mail list logo