Thanks Gabor/Duncan,
I might give that proto package a try. The R.oo package is more intuitive
for someone coming from a traditional OO background, but compared to proto,
it looks like it requires a lot more typing to create the same amount of
functionality. I've used R.oo for a number of months
On 12-02-15 11:58 PM, Ben quant wrote:
Thank you Duncan. Interesting. I find it strange that you can't get a list
of the environments. But I'll deal with it...
I'd advise thinking really carefully about this, because I think it
indicates you've got a mental model of R internals that isn't a
Thank you Duncan. Interesting. I find it strange that you can't get a list
of the environments. But I'll deal with it...
Anyway, I'm about to start a new R dev project for my company. I'm thinking
about architecture, organization, and gotchas. I went through much of the
documentation you sent me.
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Ben quant ccqu...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you Duncan. Interesting. I find it strange that you can't get a list
of the environments. But I'll deal with it...
Anyway, I'm about to start a new R dev project for my company. I'm thinking
about architecture,
On 12-02-14 12:34 AM, Ben quant wrote:
Hello,
I can get at environments if I know their names, but what if want to look
at what environments currently exist at some point in a script? In other
words, if I don't know what environments exist and I don't know their
sequence/hierarchy, how do I
Hello,
I can get at environments if I know their names, but what if want to look
at what environments currently exist at some point in a script? In other
words, if I don't know what environments exist and I don't know their
sequence/hierarchy, how do I display a visual representation of the
6 matches
Mail list logo
