Re: [R-sig-phylo] chronopl

2011-04-11 Thread Hilmar Lapp
Hi Emmanuel: On Apr 11, 2011, at 12:55 AM, Emmanuel Paradis wrote: You should not used the transformation suggested on this wiki (it is a bit outdated, NPRS has been removed from ape). In most situations, you should just leave S=1. The wiki can be updated (by anyone, in fact). How would

Re: [R-sig-phylo] chronopl

2011-04-10 Thread Emmanuel Paradis
Rafael, You should not used the transformation suggested on this wiki (it is a bit outdated, NPRS has been removed from ape). In most situations, you should just leave S=1. chronopl() is not broken, but maybe not as reliable than Sanderson's r8s, though I have seen examples where both