here is an answer that is clear, simple, and
wrong.' (Henry Louis Mencken)
--
*Von:* Theodore Garland
<mailto:theodore.garl...@ucr.edu>
*Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 30. November 2016 18:38
*An:* Menzel, Dr. Florian
*Cc:* r-sig-phylo@r-project.org<mailto:r-sig-
gt;
> --
> *Von:* Theodore Garland
> <mailto:theodore.garl...@ucr.edu>
> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 30. November 2016 18:38
> *An:* Menzel, Dr. Florian
> *Cc:* r-sig-phylo@r-project.org<mailto:r-sig-phylo@r-project.org>
> *Betreff:* Re: [
G_HTML.php
>
> Gemeinsam einen Unterschied machen!
> www.synagieren.de
>
> 'For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and
> wrong.' (Henry Louis Mencken)
>
>
> --
> *Von:* Theodore Garland
> *Gese
nd
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 30. November 2016 18:38
An: Menzel, Dr. Florian
Cc: r-sig-phylo@r-project.org
Betreff: Re: [R-sig-phylo] phylogenetic signal different from BM and random
Dear Florian,
What do you mean, exactly? Do you mean the K statistics is, say, about 0.5,
and that the randomizaton te
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 30. November 2016 18:38
An: Menzel, Dr. Florian
Cc: r-sig-phylo@r-project.org
Betreff: Re: [R-sig-phylo] phylogenetic signal different from BM and random
Dear Florian,
What do you mean, exactly? Do you mean the K statistics is, say, about 0.5,
and that the randomizaton test
Dear Florian,
What do you mean, exactly? Do you mean the K statistics is, say, about
0.5, and that the randomizaton test for phylogenetic signal (Blomberg et
al. 2003), which is based on the MSE not K, is significant, indicating that
you do have some degree of signal (more than zero)?
Cheers,
Te
Dear all,
I am analysing phylogenetic signal using Blomberg's K. For several of my traits
(univariate, continuous), the signal strongly deviates both from random and
from the Brownian Motion.
I am unsure how to interpret this. Can you give me some advice what this could
mean?
Thanks a lot!
