On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 12:38:26PM -0400, Greg Hendershott wrote:
Being git, there are probably a variety of ways to go about this. What
I might try (but haven't verified first-hand):
One-time setup:
- On master, `git pull --ff-only upstream`.
- On master, create from master a new branch named
That sounds like it would be a very nice change.
The option you want is in the view menu.
Robby
On Friday, July 3, 2015, Jens Axel Søgaard jensa...@soegaard.net wrote:
Hi All,
During the installation of DrRacket on a new laptop I realized
that the preferences dialog could need some kind of
The prefixes are based on this file:
https://github.com/racket/gui/blob/master/tex-table/tex-table.rkt
Maybe there are missing ones you're used to?
Sorry, that was supposed to be a compliment! I love DrRacket's support
for unicode and I havent wanted any symbols that aren't already
supported.
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 8:36 PM, Neil Van Dyke n...@neilvandyke.org wrote:
BTW, Emacs users can get this feature through Quack.
The feature turns causes a typed [ to insert (.
Separately, typed ] always inserts the character to agree with the
matching open paren/bracket.
To really insert [,
On Jul 3, 2015, at 2:00 AM, Tim Brown tim.br...@cityc.co.uk wrote:
Thanks for the help folks!
I'll take a long hard look at rebasing before I do anything.
It sounds like something my mother would have advised against.
On 03/07/15 03:52, Alexander D. Knauth wrote:
On Jul 2, 2015, at
I am using a cmd-name! naming format for functions that are adding to the
command list that will be communicated to the host program.
(cmd-sound! WAV-FILE)
(cmd-set-position! pos yaw-radians)
Etc.
I am considering using a terser naming convention, perhaps @name, so you
would have:
(@sound
Once upon a time I forked a repo, committed against master, and
couldn't figure out how to re-sync with upstream. I resorted to
deleting the fork and starting over. I wanted a sure-fire recipe to
avoid that.
Although I know a bit more about git now, I still follow that recipe.
So far when I've
I would also love to see a new emacs based on Racket. Is rmacs by Tony
Garnock-Jones intended to be a small project or is he meaning for it to
grow to be a serious contender with emacs, vim, etc?
I agree with Greg that the ecosystem and momentum around emacs is its
strongest point. I've
You also have unicode available to you. IDE support can help with this
-- I think the cmd-\ for lambda has worked pretty well.
I've been going this route more, especially because DrRacket supports
autocompletion of (what it deems) unique latex prefixes. For example,
in DrRacket, type \G,
I tried $ first, but it scans so close to an S that it hurt readability.
-Original Message-
From: Greg Hendershott [mailto:greghendersh...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 03, 2015 11:53 AM
To: John Carmack
Cc: racket-users@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [racket-users] API function naming
What symbols have the least historic baggage?
I've gone through this exercise a few times, and each time settled on '$'.
As Greg points out, pretty much every one of my my Racket libraries
makes use of this symbol (was it that obvious? :) ) exactly because I
was looking for something that
So I've spent a lot of time using both Racket and Elisp over the past
couple years. My feeling:
- Racket is much nicer.
- Elisp is not nearly as bad as I first thought.
Some other baseless opinions:
1. An opposite approach would be to put a more Rackety face on
Elisp. But. I feel it's probably
Thanks!
No wonder I couldn't find it in the preferences.
/Jens Axel
2015-07-03 18:59 GMT+02:00 Robby Findler ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu:
That sounds like it would be a very nice change.
The option you want is in the view menu.
Robby
On Friday, July 3, 2015, Jens Axel Søgaard
BTW, since you are looking at the preferences, I wish there was a way
to have automatic conversion of square brackets to parentheses
*always*. That is, I don't want square brackets in my racket code,
but I like the convenience of typing them over typing parentheses.
Looks like a combination of
BTW, Emacs users can get this feature through Quack.
http://www.neilvandyke.org/quack/
See checkbox menu item Quack - Options - Smart-Open-Paren, or
Customize-able variable `quack-smart-open-paren-p`.
The feature turns causes a typed [ to insert (.
Separately, typed ] always inserts the
I'd avoid @ because it's used for at-expressions, e.g. #lang
scribble or even simply #lang at-exp racket.
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 12:32 PM, John Carmack jo...@oculus.com wrote:
I am using a “cmd-name!” naming format for functions that are adding to the
command list that will be communicated to
Hi All,
During the installation of DrRacket on a new laptop I realized
that the preferences dialog could need some kind of info
on each available option.
Consider this:
http://i.imgur.com/IzsJrI8.png
There is lots of room to the right for a description.
Map delete to backspace
On 07/02/2015 08:37 PM, Benjamin Greenman wrote:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Neil Toronto neil.toro...@gmail.com
mailto:neil.toro...@gmail.com wrote:
rounded ends are the only kind that compose nicely when drawn that way
Oooh, that's interesting. After sending the first email I'd
We clearly need keyboards like this:
http://9gag.com/gag/5551148/the-entire-chinese-keyboard
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Stephen Chang stch...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
The prefixes are based on this file:
https://github.com/racket/gui/blob/master/tex-table/tex-table.rkt
Maybe there are missing
One idea is to use $ as prefix.
It probably connotes command among Unix-y folks, at least.
(Although I've seen $ used as a prefix in e.g. combinator libraries
like Parsack, I don't think it has any universal meaning like that
which would make it seem weird for your purposes?)
On Fri, Jul 3,
You also have unicode available to you. IDE support can help with this
-- I think the cmd-\ for lambda has worked pretty well.
Robby
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Stephen Chang stch...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
What symbols have the least historic baggage?
I've gone through this exercise a few
1. +1 on Neil's +sound and +set-position convention (as a private Racket
citizen not the style guide author)
2. When I find myself writing such code now, I often write a syntactic
extension that gives me some flexibility in how I want to do it:
(commands
(sound ...)
(set-position ...)
General comment on the naming conventions we come up with... These
punctuation characters that typically require a shift modifier might be
pleasing to the eye, but unpleasing to the typist.
Incidentally, while @ might have lower typing cost than cmd-, I
think it's more than 1/4 the typing
On 07/03/2015 12:32 PM, John Carmack wrote:
I am using a “cmd-name!” naming format for functions that are adding to
the command list that will be communicated to the host program.
(cmd-sound! WAV-FILE)
(cmd-set-position! pos yaw-radians)
Etc.
I am considering using a terser naming
Hello,
I am new here. using racket a very short time.
I install racket on linux mint 17 64bit, I was using it on windows 7 The deb
package work fine, more fast than in windows. very good version.
When I create a executable on linux, it create a tgz archive with the bin and
libs inside.
In
Alexis King wrote on 07/03/2015 06:33 PM:
Perhaps this isn’t applicable in this case, but may I suggest a less-common
alternative: no prefixing at all? If you put all the commands into a separate
module, users of the module can use ‘prefix-in’ to choose whatever prefix they
prefer.
For
On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 12:38:26PM -0400, Greg Hendershott wrote:
Being git, there are probably a variety of ways to go about this. What
I might try (but haven't verified first-hand):
One-time setup:
- On master, `git pull --ff-only upstream`.
- On master, create from master a new branch named
I think if there is a direction to go in, it's to make a SSH-friendly and
truly extensible text version of DrRacket. I would use this all day; I
only really use vim because it's terminal friendly and the editing is
great.
DrRacket offers a lot in terms of integration with Racket facilities
On 07/03/2015 01:11 PM, William G Hatch wrote:
I would also love to see a new emacs based on Racket. Is rmacs by Tony
Garnock-Jones intended to be a small project or is he meaning for it to
grow to be a serious contender with emacs, vim, etc?
At the moment, it's just for my own edification.
Perhaps this isn’t applicable in this case, but may I suggest a less-common
alternative: no prefixing at all? If you put all the commands into a separate
module, users of the module can use ‘prefix-in’ to choose whatever prefix they
prefer.
This can be paired with documentation that uses a
Perhaps this isn’t applicable in this case, but may I suggest a less-common
alternative: no prefixing at all? If you put all the commands into a separate
module, users of the module can use ‘prefix-in’ to choose whatever prefix
they prefer.
Prefixes (and suffixes) have two purposes. One is
Actually, ~a by itself might do what you want.
(~a 1 2 3) ; = 123
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Stephen Chang stch...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
I think the call to values is misplaced.
Here's a functioning version of foo, and a perhaps more concise alternative:
(define (foo . L)
(let ([bar
Le 03/07/2015 22:18, Stephen Chang a écrit :
I think the call to values is misplaced.
Yes it does not work, it was just to show the idea of what I wanted.
Here's a functioning version of foo, and a perhaps more concise alternative:
(define (foo . L)
(let ([bar (string-join (build-list
Hello,
To directly go to the essential : here is an example :
(define (foo . L)
(let ([bar (string-join (build-list (length L) (λ (x) ~a)) )])
(format bar (apply values L
Globally, I want to use a function who has variable parameters within a
function who has variable parameters
I think the call to values is misplaced.
Here's a functioning version of foo, and a perhaps more concise alternative:
(define (foo . L)
(let ([bar (string-join (build-list (length L) (λ (x) ~a)) )])
(apply format bar L)))
(define (my-foo . L)
(string-join (map ~a L) ))
On Fri, Jul 3,
Tony Garnock-Jones wrote on 07/03/2015 03:15 PM:
I want to explore it as a way of getting a Racket REPL on steroids. I
imagine firing up Racket, getting a deceptively normal-looking
terminal-style REPL, working for a bit (with rich, full-emacs-style
functionality available at the REPL), and then
On 02/07/2015 21:36, Greg Davidson wrote:
Is there interest in creating a Gnu Emacs Lisp Racket Language, along with the
underlying APIs (perhaps tied to DrRacket) sufficient to compile and run Gnu
Emacs Lisp extension packages? Is there prior or ongoing work for such a
project?
For some
Thanks for the help folks!
I'll take a long hard look at rebasing before I do anything.
It sounds like something my mother would have advised against.
On 03/07/15 03:52, Alexander D. Knauth wrote:
On Jul 2, 2015, at 1:53 PM, John Clements cleme...@brinckerhoff.org wrote:
On Jul 2, 2015, at
I think if there is a direction to go in, it's to make a SSH-friendly and
truly extensible text version of DrRacket. I would use this all day; I
only really use vim because it's terminal friendly and the editing is
great.
DrRacket offers a lot in terms of integration with Racket facilities
39 matches
Mail list logo
