Thanks!
it was confusing to see that changing "They" fixed he problem.
On Saturday, March 11, 2017 at 6:05:27 PM UTC-5, Ben Greenman wrote:
> Adding a field also fixes the problem:
>
>
>
> #lang scribble/manual
>
>
>
>
> @require[@for-label[racket]]
>
>
>
>
>
Adding a field also fixes the problem:
#lang scribble/manual
@require[@for-label[racket]]
@defstruct*[(abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzABCDEEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWX-Z ABCD)
([hi integer?])]{}
and the problem has to do with how `defstruct*` renders the first line of a
struct declaration. If the struct
Hi,
While writing some documentation in scribble, I've discovered that using
defstruct with really long names gives an error:
the following code fails:
#lang scribble/manual
@require[@for-label[racket]]
@defstruct*[(abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzABCDEEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWX-Z ABCD) ()]{}
yet
I have this issue in Racket 6.8.0.1 this morning, the project is compiled
by compile-directory-zos, and all .zos are ensured up-to-date.
Before I gave up, I had wrote a simple tests in DrRacket, lucky to saw the
root cause, a contract error in the body of the newly added typed class,
but the issue
You could use
, @~a{}
with a space between `,` and `@`.
Since that's sometimes too ugly, though, `@` has special handling of
comma that effectively swaps the order of the `@` and `,`. So, you
could use
@,~a{}
to get the effect of
,@~a{}
without `,` combining `@`.
Note that if you
Hi,
Is there any way I can use the terse forms of quasiquote with at-exp?
I want to use @expressions{} inside a quasi quoted list, but the unquote
comma captures the at-sign at ,@a~{}
I'm trying to achieve the following with the at-exp
;working example
#lang at-exp racket
(require
6 matches
Mail list logo
