Am 30.01.19 um 19:27 schrieb Christopher Lemmer Webber:
One very frustrating thing for me is the inconsistency between which
sexp xml representation is the "right" one, sxml or xexpr. Different
tools support different things, and thus don't interoperate when they
easily could have.
Sounds...
Also I think that the size of the code generated by arrow contracts
(when keywords are involved and other situations that perhaps aren't
worth spelling out in detail in this email) is larger than we would
like, which also doesn't help.
Robby
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 7:52 PM Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 8:23 PM Matthew Flatt wrote:
>
> At Wed, 30 Jan 2019 16:31:52 -0800 (PST), Alex Harsanyi wrote:
> > I always assumed that the contracts generated when TR code is used from
> > untyped Racket would be the same as the ones written by hand if the module
> > would be untyped
At Wed, 30 Jan 2019 16:31:52 -0800 (PST), Alex Harsanyi wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 30, 2019 at 10:53:21 PM UTC+8, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> >
> > * A lot of code is generated from your source programs.
>
>
> Do you mean (1) that the source code is large or (2) that the generated
> byte-code
On Wednesday, January 30, 2019 at 10:53:21 PM UTC+8, Matthew Flatt wrote:
>
> At Tue, 29 Jan 2019 17:32:42 -0800 (PST), Alex Harsanyi wrote:
> > I mention this because the report recommends making
> > Racket CS the default, which I am very concerned about:
> >
> > > To maximize the
Thank you!
On Wednesday, January 30, 2019 at 9:57:46 PM UTC+1, Evžen Wybitul wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
> I've just uploaded a v0.1.0 of my syntax highlighting extension for
> Racket, dubbed *Magic Racket* (I got inspired by the extension Magic
> Python). It's originally built for VSCode, but it'll be
Christopher Lemmer Webber wrote on 1/30/19 3:59 PM:
Yes, the xexprs and SXML stuff is mostly very old (perhaps most of it from so
far back that Racket even had its own little Web browser),
This one? https://docs.racket-lang.org/browser/index.html
Yes, that looks like it. Regarding using it,
Very nice.
Runs fast for my programs.
Thanks, to all who contributed, Jos
On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 at 19:59, Vincent St-Amour <
stamo...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote:
> Racket version 7.2 is now available from
>
> http://racket-lang.org/
>
> Racket-on-Chez is done in a useful sense, but we'll
Neil Van Dyke writes:
> 'John Clements' via Racket Users wrote on 1/30/19 1:46 PM:
>> Fundamentally, I think that what you’re proposing is sensible … and probably
>> a lot of work that’s not currently at the top of anyone’s list. :)
>
> Yes, the xexprs and SXML stuff is mostly very old (perhaps
Hey,
I've just uploaded a v0.1.0 of my syntax highlighting extension for Racket,
dubbed *Magic Racket* (I got inspired by the extension Magic Python). It's
originally built for VSCode, but it'll be fairly easy to port it to other
modern editors (Atom, Sublime Text) as well.
Repo link: repo
'John Clements' via Racket Users wrote on 1/30/19 1:46 PM:
Fundamentally, I think that what you’re proposing is sensible … and probably a
lot of work that’s not currently at the top of anyone’s list. :)
Yes, the xexprs and SXML stuff is mostly very old (perhaps most of it
from so far back
Racket version 7.2 is now available from
http://racket-lang.org/
Racket-on-Chez is done in a useful sense, but we'll wait until it gets
better before making it the default Racket implementation. For more
information, see
http://blog.racket-lang.org/2019/01/racket-on-chez-status.html
In
You probably already know this, but this is basically a case of parallel
evolution. The sxml tools come ultimately from Oleg Kiselyov, and I believe
he’s the one who formulated the data definition. Many people have worked with
him on this, including many people on this mailing list. I think
One very frustrating thing for me is the inconsistency between which
sexp xml representation is the "right" one, sxml or xexpr. Different
tools support different things, and thus don't interoperate when they
easily could have. I wish the Racket community could collectively make
a decision and
I think you need your servlet regexp to not match /static/
Something like this?
#:servlet-regexp #rx"^(?
wrote:
Thanks! It's true that the #:extra-files-paths works fine if I'm happy
enough with its contents not being "mounted" under a separate path. I
guess that's fine for now, though I
Thanks! It's true that the #:extra-files-paths works fine if I'm happy
enough with its contents not being "mounted" under a separate path. I
guess that's fine for now, though I really would like to figure out how
to compose servlets and dispatchers the "proper" way. :)
Stephen De Gabrielle
Hi
The contine tutorial has a good bit on serving static files:
The bit on #:extra-files-paths:
https://docs.racket-lang.org/continue/index.html#%28part._.Leaving_.Dr.Racket%29
This is what I did
https://github.com/spdegabrielle/clash
main.rkt
Sorry bit of a rush- let me know if I’m making
It seems like it should be so simple, and like Racket has the tools
already, but I can't figure out how to do it.
I have the following:
(serve/servlet start
#:servlet-regexp #rx""
#:launch-browser? #f)
I'd like to do something like the following:
- Serve
Thanks, Ben!
Instead of the ++style command line, consider using a property on the
`title` of the top-level section.
Robby
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 10:02 AM Ben Greenman
wrote:
>
> In case you have trouble navigating the docs, here's a related example.
>
> First, a Scribble function that
In case you have trouble navigating the docs, here's a related example.
First, a Scribble function that generates output with a Scribble style
named "TwoColumn":
https://github.com/nuprl/tag-sound/blob/master/gf-icfp-2018/main.rkt#L326
Second, a LaTeX macro named "TwoColumn" that formats the
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 6:46 AM Christopher Lemmer Webber <
cweb...@dustycloud.org> wrote:
> Jon Zeppieri writes:
>
> > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 4:17 AM Christopher Lemmer Webber <
> > cweb...@dustycloud.org> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Any thoughts on how I should move forward?
> >
> >
> > I think that
Yes, for sure. You need to get scribble to generate the `\usepackage`
declaration and then define a function in scribble to make an element
that generates the `\switchcolumn*`. The docs have examples on how to
do this; let us know if you get stuck.
Robby
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 9:29 AM Miguel P.
Turns out this was an incomplete contract check; the algorithm used by
`but-not/e` doesn't work if some of the elements of `small` are not in
`big`.
Thanks to Max for figuring that out. It should be fixed now.
Robby
On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 11:35 PM 'John Clements' via Racket Users
wrote:
>
>
I have already my document in latex, side by side with syncing paragraphs.
I use the paracol package and the switchcolumn*. I was wondering if I could
use this system with scribble as you say.
quarta-feira, 30 de Janeiro de 2019 às 15:08:34 UTC, Robby Findler escreveu:
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 8:47 AM Marc Kaufmann wrote:
>
> Ah, I misunderstood the synchronization to be about synchronization in time
> between source and typeset output, while the question was about synchronizing
> two outputs that are typeset from the same source next to each other. My bad.
>
At Tue, 29 Jan 2019 17:32:42 -0800 (PST), Alex Harsanyi wrote:
> I mention this because the report recommends making
> Racket CS the default, which I am very concerned about:
>
> > To maximize the maintenance benefits of Racket CS, it’s better to make it
> > the default Racket variant sooner
This is really impressive work!
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 9:49 AM Matthew Flatt wrote:
> Here's a new status report on Racket CS:
>
> http://blog.racket-lang.org/2019/01/racket-on-chez-status.html
>
> Short version: Racket CS is done in a useful sense, but we'll wait
> until it gets better
Ah, I misunderstood the synchronization to be about synchronization in time
between source and typeset output, while the question was about
synchronizing two outputs that are typeset from the same source next to
each other. My bad. However, I couldn't find anything on one-vs-two columns
other than
No it does not require that, if I am understanding you correctly. You just
need to add the two-column specific commands and use them, as appropriate.
Robby
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 1:57 AM Marc Kaufmann
wrote:
> Since you say that it requires dropping to the latex level, does it mean
> that
Jon Zeppieri writes:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 4:17 AM Christopher Lemmer Webber <
> cweb...@dustycloud.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> Any thoughts on how I should move forward?
>
>
> I think that using a `data-procedure/c` of a particular sort should allow
> you to implement this without needing access to
Philip McGrath writes:
> I've put up the code I mentioned for email-sending and a proxy server at
> https://github.com/LiberalArtist/multipart-writing-examples As noted, these
> are not general-purpose solutions to either of those problems—I know of a
> bunch of cases I don't cover, and I
31 matches
Mail list logo
