Re: [racket-users] Re: [ANN] fmt: a Racket code formatter

On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 11:07:58AM -0700, Sorawee Porncharoenwase wrote: > On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 7:01 AM Diego Crespo > mycontributiontothewo...@gmail.com > wrote: > > If you are curious about what the output looked like before, here is the > >

[racket-users] raco docs only sometimes installed?

I am having problems installing raco docs, meaning I want raco docs foo-pkg to work no matter how I installed the package. To give you an example of a failure, I created a racket package and put it up on the raco pkg server: https://pkgd.racket-lang.org/pkgn/package/bleir-sandbox

Re: [racket-users] Re: [ANN] fmt: a Racket code formatter

On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 7:01 AM Diego Crespo mycontributiontothewo...@gmail.com wrote: If you are curious about what the output looked like before, here is the > pasterack link of some of my code http://pasterack.org/pastes/23639. > Racket

Re: [racket-users] Re: [ANN] fmt: a Racket code formatter

If you are curious about what the output looked like before, here is the pasterack link of some of my code http://pasterack.org/pastes/23639. Racket supports using brackets instead of parenthesis, but you typically only see it used in things like cond and let expressions. This was adding them

Re: [racket-users] Re: [ANN] fmt: a Racket code formatter

When I read this: > On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 6:14 PM Diego Crespo < > mycontributiontothewo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > This is really cool. Between this, a Racket linter, and an LSP, Racket is > > seriously looking a lot better for larger teams. I ran it through some of > > my code and I'm

Re: [racket-users] Rationale for package structure

But you can also define two single collection packages that use the same `(define collection "...")` within the info.rkt. And that allows you to add modules with single collection packages. Only tested locally but seems to work. ded...@gmail.com schrieb am Donnerstag, 14. Oktober 2021 um