ws indeed, so I
would definitely recommend it even for small stuff. Windows doesn't have
a great CLI experience anyway, so running things in a GUI makes more
sense.
--
With regards,
Rickard Andersson
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users&q
, at 9:54 AM, Rickard Andersson <rickard.m.anders...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Why was this trash approved for posting?
Haven’t you heard that the Racket team is pivoting toward enterprise software
develop integrationpatternscloudfoundryhibernatescripting?
:)
Seriously: we rely on Google to keep th
Why was this trash approved for posting?
On 12-Sep-16 19:45, Saikiran Nandrolu wrote:
Hi Friends,
Hope you are doing great,
I have an urgent requirement from one of my esteem client, I will
appreciate if you can have an eye on the below requirement and send me
your consultant updated
> What have you used them for?
While it's certainly not the most impactful macro in the world, I was
pretty pleased with being able to do this:
https://github.com/GoNZooo/gonz/blob/master/gonz/define-test.rkt
It's a macro that allows me to bundle expected inputs with expected
outputs for those
Hi, Hector.
The following should be what you are looking for in terms of sending a POST
request:
http://pasterack.org/pastes/86127
You can find more information on `http-sendrecv` and its related functions
here:
I've previously tried to minimize the build without any success, so if you
can make a base image using only busybox or alpine linux without any
problems that'd obviously be preferable.
On Wed, 2 Sep 2015, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
On 2015-09-02 15:35:25 -0700, Jack Firth wrote:
I do a lot of
The above is of course supposed to say that `divides?` needed a few seconds
more than the modulo example even in Typed Racket. Both were of course
typed when running with TR.
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Rickard Andersson
rickard.m.anders...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, that indeed seems
, but I guess the big win is that you get contracts with
better performance instead of much faster, brittle code?
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015, Vincent St-Amour wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 08:38:46 -0400,
Rickard Andersson wrote:
Yes, that indeed seems to be the problem. However, even after managing
to wrap
I was very curious about what you were talking about, as I saw wildly
different numbers (in line with what I'd seen before).
However, I did the following test:
| ~/tools/racket/6.1.1/bin/racket typed_divide.rkt
cpu time: 536 real time: 537 gc time: 27
cpu time: 347 real time: 347 gc time: 4
I don't know how much you involve yourself in the actual making of things
(it might be a principle of yours to leave everything practical to your
son and to only help with concepts), but couldn't it be useful to simply
make a macro like a `(place-images* ([imag1 x y] ...))` or the like? Maybe
Hi,
I noticed that the `divides?` function from math/number-theory seems to be
a huge bottleneck for whatever reason.
This seems strange to me, but I figured I'd write to the list to see if
maybe there are trade-offs made that make sense mostly for big integers or
something.
Example with
Hi, David.
Perhaps I was unclear in my description, but as you guessed anyway, I
meant that the geometry of the button wasn't being affected by a
set-label method call.
This is precisely what I was looking for. Thank you very much for your
help. :)
// Rickard Andersson.
On Thu, 23 Jul
with another label.
Any help is appreciated, as I'd like to avoid these changes becoming too
ingrained in my code.
// Rickard Andersson
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Racket
Users group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
I would encourage you to release this no matter the situation in this
thread, Jack, as it sounds very interesting.
On Sun, 12 Jul 2015, Jack Firth wrote:
Out of curiosity, what are you looking to test? If it's an HTTP api, I've got a
ton of useful testing tools for that that I was just
)))
This, however, doesn't seem to work. Is there anything special about
message% that makes it so that it shouldn't be overridden? This works
fine for buttons and the purpose is to be able to move the UI components
around with certain mouse events.
// Rickard Andersson
--
You received this message because
I think if there is a direction to go in, it's to make a SSH-friendly and
truly extensible text version of DrRacket. I would use this all day; I
only really use vim because it's terminal friendly and the editing is
great.
DrRacket offers a lot in terms of integration with Racket facilities
I think if there is a direction to go in, it's to make a SSH-friendly and
truly extensible text version of DrRacket. I would use this all day; I
only really use vim because it's terminal friendly and the editing is
great.
DrRacket offers a lot in terms of integration with Racket facilities
17 matches
Mail list logo
