Re: [racket-users] puzzled by date / date*

> On Sep 22, 2016, at 12:38, Geoffrey Knauth wrote: > > Now I see how silly I was in what I wrote above. In each case I specified > time 14:51 and got 18:51, which means it is still interpreting my input as > local time. I want to be able to specify 1851Z and have it come

Re: [racket-users] [ANN] New package: live-free-or-die

> Also, with typed/racket/unsafe the optimizer *is* still run, so that's not any better *unless* you selectively choose what you want to be unsafe. Woops, you are absolutely correct, I meant: typed/racket/no-check ~Leif Andersen On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 10:27 PM, Alex Knauth

Re: [racket-users] [ANN] New package: live-free-or-die

> On Sep 22, 2016, at 9:39 PM, Jay McCarthy wrote: > > If I knew how, I'd do unsafe-in, but I just know how to fake a typed context. > The whole point is to use the optimizer so libraries like math are usable. Libraries like math/array would still be usable without

[racket-users] Re: [ANN] New package: live-free-or-die

If I knew how, I'd do unsafe-in, but I just know how to fake a typed context. The whole point is to use the optimizer so libraries like math are usable. Jay On Friday, September 23, 2016, Leif Andersen wrote: > Umm...if you're going to do this, why is it imperative, and

Re: [racket-users] RacketCon: thanks!

> I wish every day could be RacketCon. Oh god...while that would be fun...the AV nightmare...we'd need a dedicated AV team to handle that... :/ ~Leif Andersen On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 9:08 PM, Matthew Butterick wrote: > I agree. A terrific event. I wish every day could be

Re: [racket-users] [ANN] New package: live-free-or-die

Umm...if you're going to do this, why is it imperative, and not a require transformer? Also, I kind of agree with Matthias here...sigh. :'( Like, as far as I can tell, this is even worse then typed/racket/unsafe, as the optimizer is still run. O_o ~Leif Andersen On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 9:16

Re: [racket-users] [ANN] New package: live-free-or-die

On Sep 22, 2016, at 9:23 AM, Matthias Felleisen wrote: > I checked the calendar, because I thought I had gone into hibernation > and woken up on April Fool’s day. Those of us who have lived in New Hampshire take this matter quite seriously. We've also learned to

Re: [racket-users] RacketCon: thanks!

I agree. A terrific event. I wish every day could be RacketCon. On Sep 21, 2016, at 2:55 PM, 'John Clements' via Racket Users wrote: > SO glad I went to RacketCon this year. Great to meet you, great to see you. A > bunch of community members now have faces in

Re: [racket-users] Custom command completion?

Right now, `raco` doesn't have anything like that, for either built-in or custom commands. What there is currently is this code: https://github.com/racket/shell-completion which basically hard-codes options, and calls `racket` to complete `raco` commands. It knows specifically about `raco planet`

Re: [racket-users] Custom command completion?

Right, but shell completion varies by shell implementaiton so I was hoping that raco would have some built-in completion script that racket installs, and that script would dispatch to some racket code that implements custom completion for a particular command I'd like to stick something like

Re: [racket-users] Custom command completion?

Shell completion (at least for bash, which I know best) isn't handled by `raco` at all -- it's all done in bash. So I think you'd have to do some shell script hacking. Sam On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 5:30 PM, Jack Firth wrote: > If I have a `raco` command that I want to add

[racket-users] Custom command completion?

If I have a `raco` command that I want to add command completion too, how can I do that? Ideally I'm looking for some way to tell raco to dispatch to a particular function whenever shell completion is requested for any uses of my raco command. If there is no way to do this right now, what would

Re: [racket-users] sequence of moments?

> On Sep 22, 2016, at 3:57 PM, Jon Zeppieri wrote: > > > >>> On Sep 22, 2016, at 3:43 PM, Geoffrey Knauth wrote: >>> >>> On Thursday, September 22, 2016 at 3:17:50 PM UTC-4, Jon Zeppieri wrote: >>> Oh, sorry: I thought you wanted a sequence of moments

Re: [racket-users] sequence of moments?

Looks great, thank you! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit

Re: [racket-users] sequence of moments?

> On Sep 22, 2016, at 3:43 PM, Geoffrey Knauth wrote: > >> On Thursday, September 22, 2016 at 3:17:50 PM UTC-4, Jon Zeppieri wrote: >> Oh, sorry: I thought you wanted a sequence of moments from start and end >> *seconds*. If you're starting with moments, you could just

Re: [racket-users] sequence of moments?

On Thursday, September 22, 2016 at 3:17:50 PM UTC-4, Jon Zeppieri wrote: > Oh, sorry: I thought you wanted a sequence of moments from start and end > *seconds*. If you're starting with moments, you could just repeatedly add a > second (if that's the increment you want). The increment is a day

[racket-users] Re: puzzled by date / date*

Now I see how silly I was in what I wrote above. In each case I specified time 14:51 and got 18:51, which means it is still interpreting my input as local time. I want to be able to specify 1851Z and have it come out 1851Z, not 2251Z. I hope this makes sense. -- You received this message

[racket-users] puzzled by date / date*

After not getting what I wanted (I got epoch seconds reflecting an interpretation of my input as Local Time), I got what I wanted (epoch seconds interpreting my input as UTC), but now that it is working, using date* vs. date, I'm not sure why, when I vary inputs, I see no change in the output.

Re: [racket-users] sequence of moments?

> On Sep 22, 2016, at 3:12 PM, Jon Zeppieri wrote: > > > >> On Sep 22, 2016, at 2:04 PM, Geoffrey Knauth wrote: >> >> Is it possible to build a sequence of moments? (require gregor) >> >> I had a sequence of seconds (since the epoch), as in: >> >>

Re: [racket-users] sequence of moments?

> On Sep 22, 2016, at 2:04 PM, Geoffrey Knauth wrote: > > Is it possible to build a sequence of moments? (require gregor) > > I had a sequence of seconds (since the epoch), as in: > > (in-range start-seconds end-seconds seconds-in-a-day) > > If I use moments, I'm

[racket-users] Re: moment->date or moment ... -> ... epoch-seconds

On Thursday, September 22, 2016 at 10:55:11 AM UTC-7, Geoffrey Knauth wrote: > I was using Racket's date. Then I found it was creating a local time when I > needed UTC. So I started using moments from (require gregor). Now I'm trying > to figure out how to get either a regular date from a

[racket-users] Re: moment->date or moment ... -> ... epoch-seconds

I solved my immediate problem by going back to dates and using: (seconds->date secs-n [local-time?]) → date*? secs-n : real? local-time? : any/c = #t and supplying #f as local-time. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To

[racket-users] sequence of moments?

Is it possible to build a sequence of moments? (require gregor) I had a sequence of seconds (since the epoch), as in: (in-range start-seconds end-seconds seconds-in-a-day) If I use moments, I'm wondering what goes in place of _HMM_: (in-range start-moment end-moment _HMM_) -- You

[racket-users] moment->date or moment ... -> ... epoch-seconds

I was using Racket's date. Then I found it was creating a local time when I needed UTC. So I started using moments from (require gregor). Now I'm trying to figure out how to get either a regular date from a moment, or better, how I can get epoch seconds (from 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z) from a

Re: [racket-users] Re: Help with macros

Super!!! ... thanks a ton Jens. Now I'll go over the docs to understand why it works :) Regards, Kashyap On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 8:52 AM, Jens Axel Søgaard wrote: > Here is a bit more. > > #lang racket > > (require (for-syntax syntax/parse racket/syntax) >

Re: [racket-users] [ANN] New package: live-free-or-die

I checked the calendar, because I thought I had gone into hibernation and woken up on April Fool’s day. Argh. > On Sep 21, 2016, at 10:33 PM, Jay McCarthy wrote: > > I've just put a new package on the server: live-free-or-die > > This package lets you escape

Re: [racket-users] Re: Help with macros

Here is a bit more. #lang racket (require (for-syntax syntax/parse racket/syntax) syntax/parse/define) (define-simple-macro (define-primitive-application-syntax (primitive-name:id arg:id ...)) (define-simple-macro (primitive-name arg-expr:expr (... ...)) (list 'primitive-name

Re: [racket-users] Re: Help with macros

Thanks Jens ... I think I'm almost thereI get this "primitive-name: pattern variable cannot be used outside of a template in: primitive-name" at the very end now (require syntax/parse/define) (define-simple-macro (define-primitive-application-syntax (primitive-name:id arg:id ...))

Re: [racket-users] Re: Help with macros

Remove the (). The construct syntax-case needs the () which in general can be a list of identifiers, but most often an empty list, (), is used. Any identifiers in the list are treated by syntax-case as a literal. The construct syntax-parse does not use a list of identifiers. It uses an

Re: [racket-users] Re: Help with macros

Thanks Andrew ... I got past that error. I now get an error below - " syntax-parse: expected clause in: ()" (define-syntax (define-primitive stx) (syntax-parse stx () ; ERROR [(_ (primitive-name:id arg:id ...) body ...+) #:with table-name (format-id #'primitive-name

[racket-users] Re: Help with macros

The '...' that is causing the error is a '...' at the level of the _initial/outer_ macro (define-primitive-application-syntax), and so your final use of '...' is trying to splice a parameter of the _initial macro_ (define-primitive-application-syntax), but you are actually trying to output a

Re: [racket-users] Re: Help with macros

Thank you so much Jack, This certainly helps! I was following the tutorial http://www.greghendershott.com/fear-of-macros/ - It turns out that it too recommends syntax-parse at the very end :) When I tried this, I got "syntax: no pattern variables before ellipsis in template in: ..." (require

Re: [racket-users] Correcting documentation à la Beautiful Racket

Agree that adding more dependencies may be problematic. One solution would be instead of sending emails, to make this a true github issue creation method which can be done with a simple prepopulated HTML link, eg. (here title:"foo" and body:"bar"):