Re: [racket-users] How to use the REPL with #lang s-exp "expander.rkt"

On Monday, March 20, 2017 at 7:25:35 PM UTC+1, Matthew Butterick wrote: > On Mar 20, 2017, at 2:59 AM, Jan Hondebrink wrote: > > Testing top-interaction with expression: (#%top-interaction + 1 2) > . +: unbound identifier; > also, no #%app syntax transformer is bound in: + >

Re: [racket-users] How to use the REPL with #lang s-exp "expander.rkt"

> On Mar 20, 2017, at 2:59 AM, Jan Hondebrink wrote: > > Testing top-interaction with expression: (#%top-interaction + 1 2) > . +: unbound identifier; > also, no #%app syntax transformer is bound in: + > > So when you pass an expression through to the racket/base

Re: [racket-users] How to use the REPL with #lang s-exp "expander.rkt"

On Sunday, March 19, 2017 at 6:46:24 PM UTC+1, Greg Hendershott wrote: > > This works fine in the ME-test.rkt Definition window, but not in the REPL > > which doesn't have bindings for anything. I would like anything typed into > > the ME-test.rkt REPL to be used as argument to the

[racket-users] How to use the REPL with #lang s-exp "expander.rkt"

I'm playing around with SICP's Metacircular Scheme Evaluator, and thought it would be convenient to try and do that in a #lang setup in Racket, so I can use the Racket Definition Window and REPL. No Reader modification is needed, since Scheme code is already S-expressions. The expander just