Hello,
Can anyone help me in deciding which example I have to follow in RDA for
Dissertation Note since both forms are accepted in MARC examples.
The simple one :
502
##$aThesis (M.A.)--University College, London, 1969.
The complex one:
502
##$bPh.D$cUniversity of Louisville$d1997.
MARC
Hi, Basma-I've been following the complex one in your list of examples, using
the subfields b, c and d, as you illustrated.
Rick McRae
Catalog / Reference Librarian
Sibley Music Library
Eastman School of Music
(585) 274-1370
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and
When I do this search in the OCLC authority file:
dx:rda and pn:ph.d.
A few of the results include an academic degree in the 100 $c
I did not find any instruction in RDA 9.19.1 to add academic degrees to the
authorized access point. It seems like it would make more sense to add the
profession or
RDA appears to consider each piece of data as separate elements (RDA rules
7.9.2, 7.9.3, 7.9.4). Also, the example in the LC-PCC PS for RDA 7.9.1.3 uses
the more complex MARC coding with the subfields b, c, d.
We've also been using the coding with the separate subfields in order to make
the
Hi Basma,
LC-PCC policy statement for 7.9 says to record the sub-elements... in
the appropriate subfield[s] of MARC field 502, without AACR2-style
punctuation between the sub-fields and has an example with $b $c $d.
It also has an AACR2-style example, with note AACR2-style note; uses $a
only.
It
Tim
We discussed recently on the PCC list whether such terms could be
considered Other designations under 9.19.1.7, and came to no firm
conclusion. I agree with you that Profession or Occupation is more
useful.
Regards
Richard
_
Richard Moore
Authority Control
I have a print copy (Not a reproduction for once, thank goodness!) of the 2012
Law of armed conflict deskbook. I just input OCLC861338166 and am realizing
that there is a previous edition of this work so I am thinking through the edit
to the record.
The previous ed. title is slightly
Hello,
I think it could be interesting to record, in Persons authority records, that a
given author has been winner of a prize, such a Nobel, Booker, Pulitzer.
Retrieving and grouping authors winners of a given prize can be of interest for
users, although maybe is not an attribute essential
This is of interest to our schools not only for the Ontario Library Association
Forest of Reading winners but also the nominees. There are many times that we
use this as a search criteria.
Marilyn Book
Library Technician
Grand Erie Board of Education
marilyn.b...@granderie.ca
SLC feels the need for location or venue as a relationship
designator, to use for venues such as galleries where an exhibition is
held, theatres and concert halls where performances are held.
Currently we are using host institution, but I suspect most don't
this of galleries, theatres, and
Patricia posted:
The previous ed. title is slightly different I think that matters
not at all.
Depends on whether the difference is in the first five words, seems to me.
Do 77X display in a meaningful way to patrons? Are 77X $t's indexed?
We would have:
246 1 $iPrevious edition title:$a
Basma Chebani said:
Can anyone help me in deciding which example I have to follow in RDA
for Dissertation Note since both forms are accepted in MARC examples.
This seems more a matter of MARC than RDA.
We use the new 502 subfields, but retain the old punctuation (contra
PCC). So far as we
A good place to record this is as a part of the Biographical Information
element (RDA 9.17, MARC 678). For example, n 93090208, n 95063896, n
92045780.
Bob
Robert L. Maxwell
Ancient Languages and Special Collections Cataloger
6728 Harold B. Lee Library
Brigham Young University
Provo, UT
We have been using the more complex 502, coded out as of the last batch of
school papers. Our systems librarian was able to edit the display so that
it generated a Thesis statement that our bibliographers would like.
our
502 ‡b M. Phil. ‡c School of Advanced Air and Space Studies ‡d 2012.
I haven't had the need for one of these myself, but host institution
seems fine to me. A gallery is certainly a corporate body, hence, an
institution of some kind.
Adam
On Thu, 24 Oct 2013, J. McRee Elrod wrote:
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 09:22:08 -0700
From: J. McRee Elrod m...@slc.bc.ca
Also, I believe OCLC is going to be converting old simple 502s into the more
granular version with multiple subfields. That was enough for my institution to
go ahead and adopt the new format.
Alex Kyrios
Metadata and Catalog Librarian
University of Idaho
208-885-2513
akyr...@uidaho.edu
Some of these prizes that you mention are for a specific work, and
information about the prize could/should go in the work authority record.
It would be recorded in the history of the work note (MARC 678).
If the information were meant to be more searchable and retrievable than
can be done
Dear Mr. Elrod,
Thank you all for your clarifications.
I am not sure what to put in 502|a.
Can I use the term Thesis or Dissertation in 502|a ??
At the end of your reply you have mentioned On the other hand, we do not use
the 505 subfields. I think you don't use 502 subfields. Correct?
Thank
18 matches
Mail list logo