Re: [RDA-L] Statement of responsibility naming more than three persons etc.

The idea of cherry picking who to include and who to exclude from the statement of responsibility really makes me uncomfortable. The idea of relevancy is very subjective depending on context, library, etc. Remember you can always pull out additional creators/access points LOCALLY as needed. If

Re: [RDA-L] GMD revisited

[I'm posting the same thing here that I posted on AUTOCAT in response to this question.] I'll be frank...when I was at the University of Pennsylvania we redesigned the OPAC. We removed the GMD entirely from the results lists. The only place you could view it was in the full record view. AND NO

Re: [RDA-L] GMD revisited

While this is correct, it is notable that the Library of Congress is switching all bibliographic work over to RDA on the same date. Per Beacher Wiggins at the RDA Update Forum at ALA Midwinter this past weekend: everything coming out of LoC will follow RDA (they will ensure access points in copy

Re: [RDA-L] Clarification of LC's RDA implementation RE: [RDA-L] GMD revisited

@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] *On Behalf Of *Shana McDanold *Sent:* Thursday, January 31, 2013 12:01 PM *To:* RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA *Subject:* Re: [RDA-L] GMD revisited ** ** While this is correct, it is notable that the Library of Congress is switching all bibliographic work over to RDA