Re: [RDA-L] 2 manifestations on one bibliographic record

2013-01-31 Thread McRae, Rick
: Re: [RDA-L] 2 manifestations on one bibliographic record Rich McRae asked: When there is a digitized copy made of a hard-copy item- both separate mani= festations according to FRBR, is it mandated by RDA rules that two bibliogr= aphic records should be created? ... That is my understanding

[RDA-L] 2 manifestations on one bibliographic record

2013-01-30 Thread McRae, Rick
Greetings- When there is a digitized copy made of a hard-copy item- both separate manifestations according to FRBR, is it mandated by RDA rules that two bibliographic records should be created? Or is this an option, and that, with the proper coding (00x, 33x, etc.) and description, hybrid

Re: [RDA-L] 2 manifestations on one bibliographic record

2013-01-30 Thread Kevin M Randall
Rick McRae wrote: When there is a digitized copy made of a hard-copy item- both separate manifestations according to FRBR, is it mandated by RDA rules that two bibliographic records should be created? Or is this an option, and that, with the proper coding (00x, 33x, etc.) and description,

Re: [RDA-L] 2 manifestations on one bibliographic record

2013-01-30 Thread McRae, Rick
manifestations on one bibliographic record Rick McRae wrote: When there is a digitized copy made of a hard-copy item- both separate manifestations according to FRBR, is it mandated by RDA rules that two bibliographic records should be created? Or is this an option, and that, with the proper coding (00x

Re: [RDA-L] 2 manifestations on one bibliographic record

2013-01-30 Thread J. McRee Elrod
Rich McRae asked: When there is a digitized copy made of a hard-copy item- both separate mani= festations according to FRBR, is it mandated by RDA rules that two bibliogr= aphic records should be created? ... That is my understanding, just as it was mandated by AACR2. So far, so far as I know,