Description and Access
RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA on behalf of Jenifer K Marquardt j...@uga.edu
Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2013 12:29 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Cost of Retrospective Conversion for Legacy Data (Was RDA
Toolkit Price Change)
Some basic conversion
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Guy Vernon Frost
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2013 8:13 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Cost of Retrospective Conversion for Legacy Data (Was RDA
Toolkit Price Change)
You can also customize is a little for no additional charge
[mailto:RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca] On Behalf Of Gary L Strawn
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2013 4:33 PM
To: RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Cost of Retrospective Conversion for Legacy Data (Was RDA
Toolkit Price Change)
If anyone is interested, Appendixes E, F and G of the documentation
James Weinheimer wrote:
But if we are to make all of these relators and relationships useful for
the public, the simple undeniable fact is: incredible retrospective
conversions will have to be done and I have never heard of estimates of how
much those will cost. The RDA subscriptions are peanuts
[julie.renee.mo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2013 12:01 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: [RDA-L] Cost of Retrospective Conversion for Legacy Data (Was RDA
Toolkit Price Change)
James Weinheimer wrote:
But if we are to make all of these relators and relationships useful
5 matches
Mail list logo
