Henry Lam he...@silas.org.sg wrote:
2. ISBN + qualifier:
b. One of the objective of RDA is to make data become more data,
more usable to the machine. The qualifier is not part of the
identifier. Putting two data in one MARC subfield seems to me
contradicting to this objective. This
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca] On Behalf Of Henry Lam
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 1:45 AM
To: RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca
Subject: [RDA-L] Hardback paperback, and their ISBN
Hi all
I hope
In principle I agree with Mac. It's straightforward when hardback and paperback
are on the same record in OCLC. However, I think when best records in OCLC
carry ISBN of the hardback or paperback, but not both, it can be a judgement
call. Perhaps the paperback came out too late to be included in
3 matches
Mail list logo