[RDA-L] RE : [RDA-L] a rather than t for ETD

2013-05-18 Thread Paradis Daniel
Elrod Date: ven. 2013-05-17 23:12 À: RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca Objet : Re: [RDA-L] a rather than t for ETD Greta asked: So, if we are supposed to be cataloging online monographs according to Prov= ider-neutral guidelines, wouldn't that mean that they would still be catalo= ged as unpublished

Re: [RDA-L] RE : [RDA-L] a rather than t for ETD

2013-05-18 Thread Greta de Groat
- Original Message - From: Paradis Daniel daniel.para...@banq.qc.ca To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Sent: Saturday, May 18, 2013 8:15:10 AM Subject: [RDA-L] RE : [RDA-L] a rather than t for ETD With the latest update to the RDA Toolkit, instruction 2.8.1.1 now includes the sentence: Consider all

Re: [RDA-L] RE : [RDA-L] a rather than t for ETD

2013-05-18 Thread Adam Schiff
-Original Message- From: Greta de Groat Sent: Saturday, May 18, 2013 9:55 AM To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: Re: [RDA-L] RE : [RDA-L] a rather than t for ETD Why would this be an exception to the P-N practice? I don't see it addressed there as an exception. It seems to me that we have