Michael Bernhard said:
It seems to me, too, that the heading for Holmes should be Holmes, Sherlock
|c (Fictitious character).
I would like this clarified. In the same load I had a number of name
authorities the 2 that were presented as sometime authors of books no longer
had any qualifier.
, 2013 3:13 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: [RDA-L] Fictitious characters as authors
Michael Bernhard said:
It seems to me, too, that the heading for Holmes should be Holmes, Sherlock
|c (Fictitious character).
I would like this clarified. In the same load I had a number of name
] On Behalf Of Adger Williams
Sent: 04 October 2013 17:54
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Fictitious characters as authors
Or perhaps, Beedle|c(Bard: Fictitious Character)?
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 12:33 PM, rball...@frontier.com rball...@frontier.com
wrote:
I know
...@bl.uk
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Sent: Monday, October 7, 2013 2:45 AM
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Fictitious characters as authors
Kevin
App. E would suggest “Beedle|c(Bard) (Fictitious Character)”, as we don’t
currently have colons available, in RDA syntax, to separate qualifiers
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Fictitious characters as authors
In my original post, I was actually referring to using Granger as the auth.
access point (100 field), with Dumbledore and Rowling as secondary access
points (700 fields). Rowling wrote the book
Or perhaps, Beedle|c(Bard: Fictitious Character)?
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 12:33 PM, rball...@frontier.com
rball...@frontier.com wrote:
I know that RDA now allows fictitious characters to serve as authorized
access points. The book The tales of Beedle the Bard was originally
entered under the
, 2013 9:33 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: [RDA-L] Fictitious characters as authors
I know that RDA now allows fictitious characters to serve as authorized access
points. The book The tales of Beedle the Bard was originally entered under
the author J.K. Rowling. The cover shows
9:22 AM
To: RDA-L@INFOSERV.NLC-BNC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Author, author! Re: [RDA-L] Fictitious characters
as authors
hi,
is mac suggesting criminal defendants as the single term?
now that's radical!
--r
A. Ralph Papakhian, Indiana University Music Library Bloomington, IN
47405 812/855-2970
Kelly Ann Green offered:
We could follow the practice of lawyers and use entity
Diane I. Hillmann wrote:
Gosh, I think lawyers use lots more terms than that. In my experience,
it's the computer scientists who use entity.
And the followers of FRBR -- I suppose there's some overlap
Martha Yee wrote:
It would be nice if RDA could find a better word than 'author' to
encompass actors, entertainers, musicians, sculptors, composers,
photographers, painters, etc., but perhaps there is no such word.
The imprecise term creator is used in some contexts. But I find it
hard to
[I'm resending this with more adequate contact/affiliation
information in my signature--sorry for the duplication.]
Why not personality? Surely Geronimo Stilton and Koko the Gorilla
and Racter are recognizable to us as such. Persoenlichkeit ...
Works in German, too!
In despair,
/ Resource Description and Access
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of A. Ralph Papakhian
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 9:22 AM
To: RDA-L@INFOSERV.NLC-BNC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Author, author! Re: [RDA-L] Fictitious characters
as authors
hi,
is mac suggesting criminal defendants as the single
entry
?
A. Ralph Papakhian, Indiana University Music Library
Bloomington, IN 47405 812/855-2970 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
co-owner: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, March 10, 2006 10:22 AM
To: RDA-L@INFOSERV.NLC-BNC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Fictitious characters as authors
Another issue that perhaps needs addressing is animals as authors, which
also currently do not get name headings and cannot be given entries. We
are all familiar with the books by Millie
On Sat, March 11, 2006 3:46 am, J. McRee Elrod wrote:
AACR2 makes a distinction between pseudonyms (which may as literary
identities be used as prime entry AACR2 22.B2), and fictitious
characters which may not be so used. It seems to me that if one does
not know the name of the human author,
AACR2 makes a distinction between pseudonyms (which may as literary
identities be used as prime entry AACR2 22.B2), and fictitious
characters which may not be so used. It seems to me that if one does
not know the name of the human author, the name of the fictitious
character is as much a
Message-
From: J. McRee Elrod [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: RDA-L@INFOSERV.NLC-BNC.CA
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 08:46:41 -0800
Subject: [RDA-L] Fictitious characters as authors
AACR2 makes a distinction between pseudonyms (which may as literary
identities be used as prime entry AACR2 22.B2
Another issue that perhaps needs addressing is animals as authors, which
also currently do not get name headings and cannot be given entries. We
are all familiar with the books by Millie the dog and Socks (Sox?) the
cat, but commercials, fictional films and television programs, and
Dear RDA-list readers,
Previous discussion has taken place on OCLC-Cat. For the benefit of anyone
interested, I'm reposting my e-mails to that list, from the archives
http://listserv.oclc.org/archives/oclc-cat.html. (If other contributors to
the discussion want to bring their writings to your
19 matches
Mail list logo
