-BNC.CA
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 10:03 PM
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Full Draft of RDA Delayed
Will RDA be available as part of LC's Cataloger's Desktop in a manner
similar to which AACR2 is currently without additional charge to
Cataloger's Desktop subscribers? AACR2 is available within
through open access.
Cordially,
MarjorieMarjorie E. Bloss, RDA Project Manager 2827 West Gregory Street
Chicago, Illinois 60625 USA 1-733-878-4008 1-773-519-4009 (mobile) [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 14:57:56 +0200 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re:
[RDA-L] Full Draft of RDA
To respond to A. Ralph Papakhian's question:
I would hope we could get more specific information to you by the end of July,
to include interim dates (e.g., specific dates of the constituency review
period) through RDA's first release. Obviously, those dates will also have an
impact on when
The Co-Publishers realize RDA is a different business model than the one we
are use to with AACR2 and they are very much aware of open access.
are *used* to.
http://www.learnenglish.de/grammar/usedtotext2.htm
This sort of mistake is common in RDA. No wonder poor Michael Gorman
is upset.
I'm
Marjorie Bloss wrote:
(1) *Availability of the final draft*: The final draft in its
online format will be freely available to all. It will be available live
at a unique URL.
And can anything be said about the expected cost of access thereafter?
How long will the draft be available? Has
]
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 11:42:51 +0200
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Full Draft of RDA Delayed
To: RDA-L@INFOSERV.NLC-BNC.CA
Marjorie Bloss wrote:
The Co-Publishers of RDA Online (the American Library Association, the
Canadian Library Association, and the Chartered
Bernhard Eversberg wrote:
And can anything be said about the expected cost of access thereafter?
How long will the draft be available? Has any date been named?
The question of cost came up at the RDA update meeting at ALA. Don
Chatham, of ALA publishing, said that they do not yet have an
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Karen Coyle
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 9:57 AM
To: RDA-L@INFOSERV.NLC-BNC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Full Draft of RDA Delayed
Karen Coyle wrote:
In terms
Given Karen and Bob's postings about the form in which RDA will manifest, maybe
it should be asked who the intended audience for RDA is at this point. Is it
intended only for libraries that can afford, utilize, and maintain an online
subscription? If so, why don't we just give up the illusion
Of Robert Maxwell
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 10:12 AM
To: RDA-L@INFOSERV.NLC-BNC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Full Draft of RDA Delayed
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Karen Coyle
Sent: Thursday
Robert Maxwell wrote:
Bob Maxwell:
I was at this meeting and he did not say that there isn't enough of a market to
make printing the whole thing economical. He said they would have to consider the
market, etc. This came up at CC:DA Monday and I think it was pretty clear that a print
version
Marjorie Bloss wrote:
The Co-Publishers of RDA Online (the American Library Association, the
Canadian Library Association, and the Chartered Institute of Library and
Information Professionals) have reached the conclusion that further time
is required to complete the development of the new
] Subject: Re:
[RDA-L] Full Draft of RDA Delayed To: RDA-L@INFOSERV.NLC-BNC.CA Marjorie
Bloss wrote: The Co-Publishers of RDA Online (the American Library
Association, the Canadian Library Association, and the Chartered Institute
of Library and Information Professionals) have reached
Marjorie, as I recall from John Attig's remarks at the RDA update, the
JSC will be accepting comments *only* for the previously un-issued
sections. Did I hear that right?
kc
Marjorie Bloss wrote:
Dear Colleagues:
The Co-Publishers of RDA Online (the American Library Association, the
Canadian
14 matches
Mail list logo
