Re: [RDA-L] Apocrypha

The work Genesis is the work genesis. I see no need for any qualifier at all. (AACR cataloguers use to qualify everything. German cataloging tradition shows, that it is possible to use less qualifiers.) Am 10.05.2011 21:01, schrieb Adam L. Schiff: Mac wrote: Just Genesis is a faith

Re: [RDA-L] Offlist reactions to the LC Bibliographic Framework statement

-Original Message- From: J. McRee Elrod [mailto:m...@slc.bc.ca] Sent: November 9, 2011 11:42 AM To: Brenndorfer, Thomas Cc: RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Offlist reactions to the LC Bibliographic Framework statement Thomas said: An artist responsible for the

Re: [RDA-L] Offlist reactions to the LC Bibliographic Framework statement

-Original Message- What $e term would be used after a 111? We do many law symposia. author It is considered the creator of the work, just like a person may be. So the correct relator term is author. --- There is also this from RDA I.1: If the element used to

Re: [RDA-L] Offlist reactions to the LC Bibliographic Framework statement

-Original Message- What $e term would be used after a 111? We do many law symposia. author It is considered the creator of the work, just like a person may be. So the correct relator term is author. Forgive me if I am mistaken, but $e is not used for relators in 111 or 711.

Re: [RDA-L] Offlist reactions to the LC Bibliographic Framework statement

$j is used in 111 and 711 for the relator code ($e is used for subordinate unit). Thomas Brenndorfer Guelph Public Library From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Christopher D. Cook Sent: November 10, 2011

Re: [RDA-L] Author

I rather agree with Adam. In my earlier years as a cataloger, we catalogued a lot of missionary materials. While the publisher was not due an 1XX, it certainly, in some cases was due a 7XX; it is was the issuing body and in some way caused it to be emanated for its own interests. We did not do

Re: [RDA-L] Offlist reactions to the LC Bibliographic Framework statement

Well for 111 and 711 you would encode the relater term in $j. But the relator term/relationship designator certainly can be used with conference access points. Adam ^^ Adam L. Schiff Principal Cataloger University of Washington Libraries Box 352900

[RDA-L] Cataloging Rules by Martha M. Yee

http://myee.bol.ucla.edu/catrulrdfIntro.htm At the suggestion of an SLC cataloguer, I've just revisited Martha Yee's Cataloguing rules. I've long admired Ms Yee's position paper on OPAC display (available on the SLC website). That admiration now extends to her rules. These rules achieve the

Re: [RDA-L] Cataloging Rules by Martha M. Yee

I find some of the material nice and simple, with short summaries and descriptions, accompanied by lists. Other parts appear muddled and confused. Many attributes for a manifestation are shoved up to the expression level, such as title and extent. That leaves the bizarre 2.2.12 Extent of