Karen Coyle wrote:
What type of entity would be part be? I'm thinking that there is no
such entity as part but that a work can be a is part of another
work. Taking into account that the work is a single entity that may be
related to any number of expression/manifestations it cannot be
Here are some more issues with the model of the Working Group, now
centering on the concept of an aggregating expression. The more I
think about this, the less I understand what this entity is supposed to
be in the first place, and what might be the point of having it at all.
In the main body
In article 4f093f5d.4070...@hdm-stuttgart.de, you wrote:
Actually, the thing Mac and I disagree about (but haven't had time to go
into more deeply yet) is the question of main entry as such.
Main entry under creator seems a tradition worth keeping:
-in order to maintain consistency with
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of J. McRee Elrod [m...@slc.bc.ca]
Sent: January-08-12 11:53 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Some comments on the
Thomas said:
A collection of short stories would get the 650 heading, Short stories ...
In our shop, a collection of short stories would have that heading in a
655; only criticism of short stories would have that heading in 650.
Having it in 650 would exclude it from a genre index.
Many
08.01.2012 15:24, Heidrun Wiesenmüller:
Here are some more issues with the model of the Working Group, now
centering on the concept of an aggregating expression. The more I
think about this, the less I understand what this entity is supposed to
be in the first place, and what might be the point
6 matches
Mail list logo
