If we wanted to record a distributor (cf. RDA 21.4), and that distributor was
only responsible for distribution in a particular geographic area, would we use
264 $3 (materials specified)?
E.g.: Piscataway, NJ : $b Transactions Publishers, Rutgers University, $c
[2012] $3 Copies distributed in
Benjamin Abrahamse wrote:
If we wanted to record a distributor (cf. RDA 21.4), and that distributor was
only responsible for distribution in a particular geographic area, would we
use 264 $3 (materials specified)?
E.g.: Piscataway, NJ : $b Transactions Publishers, Rutgers University, $c
If look at the examples from OCLC Bibliographic Formats and Standards,
yours is not correct.
‡3 Materials specified Information to differentiate the multiple statements
of the described materials to which the field applies. 260
Paris : ‡a New York :‡b Vogue ‡c 1964- 260 2
‡3 1980-May 1993 ‡a
Ben posted:
Piscataway, NJ : $b Transactions Publishers, Rutgers University, $c [=
2012] $3 Copies distributed in North America
Perhaps we should ask MARBI for 264 $z Public note. Ooops, MARBI is gone.
How about:
264 2 $aPiscataway, NJ : $b[Distributed in North America by] Transactions
4 matches
Mail list logo
