The title statement has never been that optimal for collocating works,
because even when it's not been left to cataloger judgement but has been
recorded according to very specific rules -- they were rules based on
how the title was printed on the item-in-hand (manifestation), which
isn't
The current NAF does include records for expressions, and those include
much, much more than literary works. Two of the most obvious are sacred
religious texts and musical works (including operas and ballets).
Scientific texts also have different expressions: the Latin and
vernacular
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Jonathan Rochkind
Sent: October 18, 2012 10:01 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] RDA promoting the work entity?
I'm
-bac.gc.ca] On Behalf Of Brenndorfer, Thomas
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 10:17 AM
To: RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] RDA promoting the work entity?
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and
Access [mailto:RDA-L
I just attended an introductory webinar about RDA given by Chris Oliver.
I'm wondering what changes RDA has that will help promote the collocation
of the work entity. Is there an eye towards a web based authority file like
VIAF, but for works, that can be integrated with our records? When
[lisa.abra.mcc...@gmail.com]
Verzonden: woensdag 17 oktober 2012 23:58
Aan: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Onderwerp: [RDA-L] RDA promoting the work entity?
I just attended an introductory webinar about RDA given by Chris Oliver. I'm
wondering what changes RDA has that will help promote
6 matches
Mail list logo
