Re: [RDA-L] Relationship designator for a conference (fwd)

2013-07-15 Thread J. McRee Elrod
Susan Lewis asked (an SLC cataloguer): Did we come up with something for this? No, we still have no relationship designator for a conference, either 111 or 711. Just leave it off if we haven't one by our implementation date August 15th? Should we consider issuing body even though they are not

Re: [RDA-L] Relationship designator for a conference (fwd)

2013-07-15 Thread Adam L. Schiff
You can, per PCC guidelines, use creator if nothing else is appropriate. However, author is what should be used in my opinion. author A person, family, or corporate body responsible for creating a work that is primarily textual in content, regardless of media type (e.g., printed text, spoken

Re: [RDA-L] Relationship designator for a conference

2013-05-09 Thread Lee, Deborah
Sent: 07 May 2013 14:28 To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Relationship designator for a conference Right you are! Since we haven't been using relationship designators on conferences, I keep forgetting that nicety. Thanks, Greta Sent from my iPad On May 6, 2013, at 11:39

Re: [RDA-L] Relationship designator for a conference

2013-05-07 Thread Moore, Richard
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Relationship designator for a conference Early on in the RDA process we consulted with the Library of Congress on this issue and determined that there is no appropriate relationship designation to describe the relationship between a conference and its proceedings. Host

Re: [RDA-L] Relationship designator for a conference

2013-05-07 Thread Gene Fieg
*To:* RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA *Subject:* Re: [RDA-L] Relationship designator for a conference ** ** Early on in the RDA process we consulted with the Library of Congress on this issue and determined that there is no appropriate relationship designation to describe the relationship

[RDA-L] Relationship designator for a conference

2013-05-03 Thread Lee, Deborah
Hello, I am struggling to think of the appropriate relationship designator to describe the relationship that the conference has to the book based on that conference. I wondered if anyone had any ideas? (I have considered issuing body, as this is what we have used for works which have

Re: [RDA-L] Relationship designator for a conference

2013-05-03 Thread Robert Maxwell
@courtauld.ac.uk] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2013 11:01 AM To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: [RDA-L] Relationship designator for a conference Hello, I am struggling to think of the appropriate relationship designator to describe the relationship that the conference has to the book based

Re: [RDA-L] Relationship designator for a conference

2013-05-03 Thread Greta de Groat
] on behalf of Lee, Deborah [deborah@courtauld.ac.uk] *Sent:* Friday, May 03, 2013 11:01 AM *To:* RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA *Subject:* [RDA-L] Relationship designator for a conference Hello, I am struggling to think of the appropriate relationship designator to describe the relationship

Re: [RDA-L] Relationship designator for a conference

2013-05-03 Thread Benjamin A Abrahamse
and Access / Resource Description and Access [mailto:RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca] On Behalf Of Lee, Deborah Sent: Friday, May 03, 2013 1:02 PM To: RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca Subject: [RDA-L] Relationship designator for a conference Hello, I am struggling to think of the appropriate relationship