[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of J. McRee Elrod
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 5:31 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Relators for contributors and consultants
The wise Deborah said:
I agree with Thomas that the authors of the articles in this
compilation of articles
-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Brenndorfer, Thomas
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 12:46 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Relators for contributors and consultants
I believe this is related to the removal of the limitation on the number of
added entries in AACR2 21.7B
Of Bernadette Mary O'Reilly
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2013 3:59 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: [RDA-L] Relators for contributors and consultants
Hello,
I want to provide a 'model' record for training purposes for a resource
which is a dictionary of biography. It has
: Resource Description and Access /
Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Bernadette Mary
O'Reilly
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2013 3:59 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: [RDA-L]
Relators for contributors and consultants
Hello
-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Deborah Fritz
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 12:57 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Relators for contributors and consultants--Pre-existing
poem
Bernadette asked: And if a composer sets a pre-existing poem to music, what
relator term should the poet get
and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Wayne Richter
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 5:21 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Relators for contributors and consultants--Pre-existing
poem
And for a really complicated situation how about Mahlers Das Lied von der
The wise Deborah said:
I agree with Thomas that the authors of the articles in this compilation
of articles are co-creators ...
So for whom would you use $e contributor, or $4 ctb, if not for the
writers of portions of a compilation?
I fear using $e author or $4 aut will result in the first
M. E. m.k.e.m...@gmail.com wrote:
19.3: Other Person, Family, and Corporate Body Associated with a Work
Designator: other (work)
Example: 700 1- Doe, John, $e other (work)
21.6: Other Person, Family, and Corporate Body Associated with a Manifestation
Designator: other (manifestation)
22.4:
J. McRee Elrod m...@slc.bc.ca wrote:
I said:
We need a $e term and $4 code for contributor.
Could someone with the appropriate skills and connections propose the
addition of contributor to RDA relationship terms ...
It's already in RDA: see 20.2. It's just not explicitly listed in RDA
:56
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Relators for contributors and consultants
Multiple creators and aggregate works are covered in RDA 19.1.2:
If the resource being described contains two or more works associated
with different persons, families, or corporate bodies
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Relators for contributors and consultants
Interesting point, but I’m not sure about the reading of 19.1.2. Does it
really mean that creators of components may be treated as co-creators of the
aggregate (which would presumably mean that they could have creator-level
relators
Bernadette said:
Interesting point, but I'm not sure about the reading of 19.1.2. Does
it really mean that creators of components may be treated as co-creators
of the aggregate ...
I think not. That would result in main/prime entry under the first
mentioned author of a part.
For analytic
I said:
We need a $e term and $4 code for contributor.
Could someone with the appropriate skills and connections propose the
addition of contributor to RDA relationship terms, and cnt
Contributor to the MARC code list?
They are needed for writers of parts of collections, when those parts
don't
0EW.
***
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Sean Chen
Sent: 26 February 2013 04:44
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Relators for contributors and consultants
Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Bernadette Mary O'Reilly
Sent: February-26-13 4:23 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Relators for contributors and consultants
Thanks, Sean. That tends to confirm my
] Relators for contributors and consultants
Bernadette asked:
,,, And what about the contributors?
There is:
$e writer of added text [MRI: consider writer]
or the code:
$4 wam Writer of accompanying material
Neither of which is spot on. Perhaps we should request contributor
and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of J. McRee Elrod
Sent: 25 February 2013 06:08
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Relators for contributors and consultants
Bernadette asked:
,,, And what about the contributors
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca] On Behalf Of Michael Cohen
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 3:00 PM
To: RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Relators for contributors and consultants
Bernadette,
My understanding is that the relator term author is meant to be related to a
creator of a work. In the model you are describing the contributing authors
aren't the creator of the described work which is the dictionary of biography.
I think general practice is not to delve into the
Bernadette asked:
,,, And what about the contributors?
There is:
$e writer of added text [MRI: consider writer]
or the code:
$4 wam Writer of accompanying material
Neither of which is spot on. Perhaps we should request contributor?
__ __ J. McRee (Mac) Elrod (m...@slc.bc.ca)
20 matches
Mail list logo
