Hi all,
Maybe the centos6 rpms could be build with a dependency from the software
collections repository (
https://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/SCL)? Gianluca, do
you know if this could be a viable solution?
Best,
Riccardo
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 4:41 AM, Greg Landrum wrote:
> Now that I have a Centos6 box available, I'm realizing that it has python
> 2.6
> Are you also installing Python 2.7 on those machines when you build the
> RDKit?
No, there are a few methods for getting 2.7 as RPMs, but the deafult
build stic
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 8:39 AM, Greg Landrum wrote:
> This PR: https://github.com/rdkit/rdkit/pull/864
> has a version that builds a python wrapper for me on Centos6 with python2.7
> installed manually.
I'll check it out
--
Gianluca Sforna
http://plus.google.com/+gianlucasforna - http://twi
On Friday, 15 April 2016, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 4:41 AM, Greg Landrum > wrote:
> > Now that I have a Centos6 box available, I'm realizing that it has python
> > 2.6
> > Are you also installing Python 2.7 on those machines when you build the
> > RDKit?
>
> No, there are
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Riccardo Vianello
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Maybe the centos6 rpms could be build with a dependency from the software
> collections repository
> (https://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/SCL)? Gianluca, do
> you know if this could be a viable solution?
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Greg Landrum wrote:
> The problem here is that the rdkit doesn't really support Python 2.6
> anymore. I don't remember at the moment which pieces we used, but there are
> 2.7+ bits in there
Then I guess the Software Collections approach mentioned by Riccardo
is b
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Greg Landrum
> wrote:
> > The problem here is that the rdkit doesn't really support Python 2.6
> > anymore. I don't remember at the moment which pieces we used, but there
> are
> > 2.7+ bits in there
>
>
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 1:36 PM, Greg Landrum wrote:
> Would you be comfortable with me doing the release based on the current
> state of the code (once that PR is merged, of course)?
Yes, I guess we're good to go.
As soon as we have the final tarball I will build RHEL 7 and Fedora
RPMs at the us
Great.
After this next round of travis builds passes I will merge the two
outstanding PRs and then do the release.
-greg
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 7:07 PM, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 1:36 PM, Greg Landrum
> wrote:
> > Would you be comfortable with me doing the release base
