Re: [Rdkit-devel] More build fun with RHEL 6

2016-04-15 Thread Gianluca Sforna
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 1:36 PM, Greg Landrum wrote: > Would you be comfortable with me doing the release based on the current > state of the code (once that PR is merged, of course)? Yes, I guess we're good to go. As soon as we have the final tarball I will build RHEL 7

Re: [Rdkit-devel] More build fun with RHEL 6

2016-04-15 Thread Greg Landrum
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Gianluca Sforna wrote: > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Greg Landrum > wrote: > > The problem here is that the rdkit doesn't really support Python 2.6 > > anymore. I don't remember at the moment which pieces we used,

Re: [Rdkit-devel] More build fun with RHEL 6

2016-04-15 Thread Gianluca Sforna
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Greg Landrum wrote: > The problem here is that the rdkit doesn't really support Python 2.6 > anymore. I don't remember at the moment which pieces we used, but there are > 2.7+ bits in there Then I guess the Software Collections approach

Re: [Rdkit-devel] More build fun with RHEL 6

2016-04-15 Thread Gianluca Sforna
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Riccardo Vianello wrote: > Hi all, > > Maybe the centos6 rpms could be build with a dependency from the software > collections repository > (https://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/SCL)? Gianluca, do > you know if this

Re: [Rdkit-devel] More build fun with RHEL 6

2016-04-15 Thread Greg Landrum
On Friday, 15 April 2016, Gianluca Sforna wrote: > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 4:41 AM, Greg Landrum > wrote: > > Now that I have a Centos6 box available, I'm realizing that it has python > > 2.6 > > Are you also installing Python 2.7 on

Re: [Rdkit-devel] More build fun with RHEL 6

2016-04-15 Thread Gianluca Sforna
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 8:39 AM, Greg Landrum wrote: > This PR: https://github.com/rdkit/rdkit/pull/864 > has a version that builds a python wrapper for me on Centos6 with python2.7 > installed manually. I'll check it out -- Gianluca Sforna

Re: [Rdkit-devel] More build fun with RHEL 6

2016-04-15 Thread Gianluca Sforna
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 4:41 AM, Greg Landrum wrote: > Now that I have a Centos6 box available, I'm realizing that it has python > 2.6 > Are you also installing Python 2.7 on those machines when you build the > RDKit? No, there are a few methods for getting 2.7 as RPMs,

Re: [Rdkit-devel] More build fun with RHEL 6

2016-04-15 Thread Riccardo Vianello
Hi all, Maybe the centos6 rpms could be build with a dependency from the software collections repository ( https://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/SCL)? Gianluca, do you know if this could be a viable solution? Best, Riccardo ​

Re: [Rdkit-devel] More build fun with RHEL 6

2016-04-15 Thread Greg Landrum
This PR: https://github.com/rdkit/rdkit/pull/864 has a version that builds a python wrapper for me on Centos6 with python2.7 installed manually. FWIW, I've attached the bootstrap.sh that I used to configure the vagrant box (clearly still a work in progress: it doesn't bring in the requirements

Re: [Rdkit-devel] More build fun with RHEL 6

2016-04-14 Thread Greg Landrum
Now that I have a Centos6 box available, I'm realizing that it has python 2.6 Are you also installing Python 2.7 on those machines when you build the RDKit? On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Gianluca Sforna wrote: > For the records, Build with RHEL/CentOS 7 succeded, this

Re: [Rdkit-devel] More build fun with RHEL 6

2016-04-14 Thread Greg Landrum
That'd be awesome.. thanks. :-) On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Brian Kelley wrote: > The fix is buried here: > > https://github.com/rdkit/rdkit/pull/677/files > > It is in the BOOST_PYTHON_SUPPORT_SHARED_CONST > > The reason we didn't merge is was the problem with the

Re: [Rdkit-devel] More build fun with RHEL 6

2016-04-14 Thread Brian Kelley
The fix is buried here: https://github.com/rdkit/rdkit/pull/677/files It is in the BOOST_PYTHON_SUPPORT_SHARED_CONST The reason we didn't merge is was the problem with the exported defines, however I can tie it into the boost version in the FilterCatalog header file. We had initially thought