Re: [Rdkit-discuss] can't kekulize smiles generated by Chem.MolToSmiles

2011-01-10 Thread TJ O'Donnell
Hi Greg, As usual, thanks for your quick response. Yes, these were big molecules. Let me know if you'd like me to try out any changes. I can recompile changes from subversion easily now. I discovered these four examples using 1/10 of the chembl database and can try any new code changes on the

Re: [Rdkit-discuss] can't kekulize smiles generated by Chem.MolToSmiles

2011-01-10 Thread Greg Landrum
Dear TJ, On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 5:49 PM, TJ O'Donnell t...@acm.org wrote: As usual, thanks for your quick response.  Yes, these were big molecules. Let me know if you'd like me to try out any changes.  I can recompile changes from subversion easily now.  I discovered these four examples

Re: [Rdkit-discuss] can't kekulize smiles generated by Chem.MolToSmiles

2011-01-10 Thread Greg Landrum
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 5:09 AM, Greg Landrum greg.land...@gmail.com wrote: Dear TJ, On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 5:49 PM, TJ O'Donnell t...@acm.org wrote: As usual, thanks for your quick response.  Yes, these were big molecules. Let me know if you'd like me to try out any changes.  I can

Re: [Rdkit-discuss] can't kekulize smiles generated by Chem.MolToSmiles

2011-01-09 Thread Greg Landrum
Hi TJ, On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 2:37 AM, TJ O'Donnell t...@acm.org wrote: Thanks Greg.  I compiled in the changes and that molfile works fine now, but. Here are four new examples of molfiles that convert to mol and smiles just fine, but the resulting smiles won't parse properly back to a

Re: [Rdkit-discuss] can't kekulize smiles generated by Chem.MolToSmiles

2011-01-06 Thread Andrew Dalke
On Jan 7, 2011, at 3:22 AM, TJ O'Donnell wrote: [Cl-].CC(C)(C)c1[Te+]c(C(C)(C)C)cc(/C=C/C=C2C=C(C(C)(C)C)OC(C(C)(C)C)=C2)c1 [18:13:52] Can't kekulize mol Looks like it's the [Te] which should be written [te+]. Chem.CanonSmiles(c1cc[te+]cc1) 'c1cc[Te+]cc1'

Re: [Rdkit-discuss] can't kekulize smiles generated by Chem.MolToSmiles

2011-01-06 Thread Greg Landrum
Hi TJ, Andrew hit it dead on: On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 3:58 AM, Andrew Dalke da...@dalkescientific.com wrote: On Jan 7, 2011, at 3:22 AM, TJ O'Donnell wrote: [Cl-].CC(C)(C)c1[Te+]c(C(C)(C)C)cc(/C=C/C=C2C=C(C(C)(C)C)OC(C(C)(C)C)=C2)c1 [18:13:52] Can't kekulize mol Looks like it's the [Te]