Re: [Rdkit-discuss] RDKit Windows binaries - exists ? Where ?

2017-05-04 Thread Greg Landrum
Hi Jan, I've stopped creating standalone windows binaries now that the conda packages are available. Using conda makes the installation a lot simpler and saves me a fair amount of time while doing the builds. Is using the anaconda python distribution a problem for you? On Thu, May 4, 2017 at

Re: [Rdkit-discuss] nitro-compounds from smarts

2017-05-04 Thread Curt Fischer
Rafal, > this three Mols (m1, m2, m33) below should all represent nitrobenzene, > right? > >>> m33=Chem.MolFromSmarts('c1c1[N+](=O)[O-]') > >>> m1=Chem.MolFromSmiles('c1c1[N+](=O)[O-]') > >>> m2=Chem.MolFromSmiles('c1c1N(=O)(=O)') > I guess m33 represents nitrobenzene in a sense,

Re: [Rdkit-discuss] nitro-compounds from smarts

2017-05-04 Thread Rafal Roszak
Greg, Thx for answer, but it is still unclear for me. You wrote: > So, the short answer to your question is: "yes". You will need to rewrite > your SMARTS queries so that nitro groups are expressed consistently. If you > want those queries to match what the RDKit's molecule processing code >

[Rdkit-discuss] RDKit Windows binaries - exists ? Where ?

2017-05-04 Thread Jan Holst Jensen
Hi, I was trying to find Python Windows binaries for the latest RDKit release. I could find them for the older 2016_03_1 release on SourceForge but had no luck finding anything newer on SourceForge or Github. According to GitHub they should be there:

Re: [Rdkit-discuss] nitro-compounds from smarts

2017-05-04 Thread Greg Landrum
Hi Rafal, The MolFromSmiles() code is intended to create a "normal" molecule and as part of doing that some sanitization work is carried out ( http://www.rdkit.org/docs/RDKit_Book.html#molecular-sanitization). Part of that includes standardizing nitro groups (as well as a few other functional