[REBOL] Re: Submitted, for your approval.

2002-05-27 Thread Carl Read
On 27-May-02, Ed Dana wrote: Greetings all, Attached is a small game I created in my continuing effort to understand REBOL. It is another guessing game, slightly more sophisticated than the one I submitted previously. Please look it over and feel free to criticize, but do be gentle, as

[REBOL] Re: Submitted, for your approval.

2002-05-27 Thread Anton
Well, instead of this: Prin Matched: Prin Matched Prin Placed: Print Placed Print you could write print [Matched: Matched Placed: Placed] I also suggest following Rebol Tech's style-guide. Anton. -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to

[REBOL] Re: Submitted, for your approval.

2002-05-27 Thread Ingo Hohmann
Hi Ed, maybe it would be better (at least better looking) if you turned your function/refinements design into an object/funcs design, wouldn't take much I guess. And you can give 'print a block, like this: print [ Matched: Matched Placed: Placed newline] 'newline adds, you'll guess it, a

[REBOL] Re: help on Tooltips?

2002-05-27 Thread Brett Handley
Hi Ingo, Hi All, After moving around a while I get no more events (at least, 'over isn't called any more), any ideas on how to make it behave better? I haven't had a chance to try out your code. I can only think of two things off the top of my head right now. (1) Your events might be being

[REBOL] list! bug

2002-05-27 Thread Romano Paolo Tenca
Is this a bug? to-list 1 == make list! [] --- Ciao Romano -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe in the subject, without the quotes.

[REBOL] Re: bug: not able to convert integer variable with to-binary

2002-05-27 Thread Carl Read
On 28-May-02, tmo wrote: hi. to-binary [255] works...= #{FF} but when i use a integer variable, for example this: mavar: 255 to-binary [mavar] or to-binary [:mavar] = it doesnt work !!! So how can convert my integer variable into binary ? Your problem is that the 'mavar in the block

[REBOL] Re: list! bug

2002-05-27 Thread Ingo Hohmann
Hi Romano, Romano Paolo Tenca wrote: Is this a bug? to-list 1 == make list! [] No, it's no bug, just not too intuitive. For most datatypes to-datatype value converts the value into the other datatype, but in the special case of to-any-series-datatype an-integer A new series is

[REBOL] Re: help on Tooltips?

2002-05-27 Thread Gregg Irwin
Hi Ingo, I also haven't tried your code, but I did submit feedback on DROP-DOWN. --Gregg -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe in the subject, without the quotes.

[REBOL] Re: list! bug

2002-05-27 Thread Gregg Irwin
Hi Ingo, ...in the special case of to-any-series-datatype an-integer A new series is created, with an initial size of an-integer. Then why do to-block and to-hash work correctly? to-hash 1 == make hash! [1] to-block 1 == [1] to-list 1 == make list! [] --Gregg -- To unsubscribe from

[REBOL] Re: list! bug

2002-05-27 Thread Gabriele Santilli
Hi Ingo, On Monday, May 27, 2002, 4:51:06 PM, you wrote: IH converts the value into the other datatype, but in the special case of IHto-any-series-datatype an-integer IH A new series is created, with an initial size of an-integer. Nope, that's for MAKE, not for TO. What Romano showed

[REBOL] Re: Submitted, for your approval.

2002-05-27 Thread Ed Dana
Ed Dana wrote: As I said, this is a learning excursive for me. Sometimes the best way ^ to learn is to make all the mistakes you can up front. Saves time by not making them later. :) DOH! Stupid spell-checker! Make that exercise, not excursive!

[REBOL] Enigma about Ladislav sameness

2002-05-27 Thread Romano Paolo Tenca
Hi, I have an enigma about Ladislav's mut-equal1? (from http://www.rebolforces.com/~ladislav/evaluation.html) b ;== 1 string? b ;== true identical? a b ;== false same? a b ;== false equal-state? a b ;== false strict-equal? a b ;== false equal? a b ;== false and: mut-equal? a b ;== false But:

[REBOL] Re: list! bug

2002-05-27 Thread Ingo Hohmann
Thanks Gabriele, I stand corrected ... out to find that thinking brain dog now ;-) Ingo Gabriele Santilli wrote: Hi Ingo, On Monday, May 27, 2002, 4:51:06 PM, you wrote: IH converts the value into the other datatype, but in the special case of IHto-any-series-datatype

[REBOL] Re: funny...

2002-05-27 Thread Jason Cunliffe
I look at IOS Reblet Applications on RebolTech site and... 400 KB for a page??? faster with less bandwidth... I guess you mean http://rebol.com/reblets.html That's because there are 15 images weighing in at 377Kb I suspect they were made from REBOL directly. Thus legible but not optimized

[REBOL] Re: Submitted, for your approval.

2002-05-27 Thread Ed Dana
Ammon Johnson wrote: Hmm... Some things that i found: Does this confuse anyone else? What is your guess? *@#% Matched: 2 Placed: 3 What is your guess? @#%* Matched: 2 Placed: 3 Hmmm... Without knowing the details of what the computer had chosen, it's hard to say, but this is a

[REBOL] Re: REBOL momentum builds

2002-05-27 Thread Brett Handley
Hi, One question: Can Rebol handle UDP packets? On those examples people are allvays using TCP but we use UDP on our protocols to embedded systems. Yes, but I haven't used it. I have on occassion seen scripts floating around that use it. Maybe someone else will point you to some examples.

[REBOL] uppercase

2002-05-27 Thread Dr. Louis A. Turk
Hi rebols, x: hello == hello y: uppercase x == HELLO x == HELLO Why is x now uppercase? This is really unexpected behavior! Is this a bug? Is it like this in the new version of rebol (I haven't upgraded yet)? Louis -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to

[REBOL] Off line

2002-05-27 Thread Dr. Louis A. Turk
Hi rebols, Last week our Cox cable line was severed, and we were off line for several days and my mailbox overflowed and some email therefore was bounced. If you suspect your message to me bounced, please resend it. Thanks, Louis -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to

[REBOL] Upgrade now or wait?

2002-05-27 Thread Dr. Louis A. Turk
Hi rebols, Is the new version of rebol-view going to make my scripts not work? What problems should I expect? Should I upgrade now, or wait? Louis PS I have to add that rebol is great, and the people on this list are absolutely super. -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an

[REBOL] Re: Enigma about Ladislav sameness

2002-05-27 Thread Anton
Is this an unsolved problem or do you know the answer and you are challenging us to also find out ? Anton. Hi, I have an enigma about Ladislav's mut-equal1? (from http://www.rebolforces.com/~ladislav/evaluation.html) b ;== 1 string? b ;== true identical? a b ;== false same? a b ;==

[REBOL] Re: uppercase

2002-05-27 Thread Charles
That is rather odd. The function, I do not feel, should actually perform an operation on the argument being passed. At least, not in general. Same happens with 'lowercase'. Well, it answers the question I recall seeing about capitalizing: uppercase/part x 1 ;) Hi rebols, x: hello

[REBOL] Re: xwt and rebol ?

2002-05-27 Thread Alan Crandall
Hello laplace On 25-May-02, laplace wrote: The rebol plugin doesn't work any more in IE6 so what about combining rebol and xwt: http://www.xwt.org/tutorial.html Just got this from the author: To: Alan Crandall [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Demo page From: Adam Megacz [EMAIL PROTECTED]