Re: Please /dev/null html-only mail rather than sending it out on this list

2004-04-20 Thread Alexander Lyamin
Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 04:26:50PM +0200, Philippe Gramoull? wrote: Hello, Maybe you should give a try at crm114 ( http://crm114.sf.net ) by Bill Yera= zunis Ph.D It's using Markovian filters instead of Bayesian ones and the homepage clai= ms 1 spam out of 8738 messages (4240 spam, 4498

Re: Please /dev/null html-only mail rather than sending it out on this list

2004-04-19 Thread Elliott Mitchell
I suspect this is the more general problem that SpamAssassin on Namesys needs to be updated, since a *lot* is getting through now. Most servers get patches to fix security holes. SpamAssassin gets patches to spam holes. Both are annoying. -- (\___(\___(\__ --= 8-) EHM =--

Re: Please /dev/null html-only mail rather than sending it out on this list

2004-04-19 Thread Hendrik Visage
On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 11:58:08PM -0700, The Amazing Dragon wrote: Most servers get patches to fix security holes. SpamAssassin gets patches to spam holes. Both are annoying. Or get DSPAM that the users train and the SysAdmin can got fix security holes ;^)

Re: Please /dev/null html-only mail rather than sending it out on this list

2004-04-19 Thread Alexander Lyamin
Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 05:45:04PM -0400, Pierre Abbat wrote: On Sunday 18 April 2004 17:26, Whit Blauvelt wrote: Hi, :0 B * H ?? Content-Type: multipart * Content-Type: text/html * ! Content-Type: text/plain * ! ^Received: /dev/null #The Received check is there because I am a postmaster.

Re: Please /dev/null html-only mail rather than sending it out on this list

2004-04-19 Thread Alexander Lyamin
Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 05:26:59PM -0400, Whit Blauvelt wrote: Hi, That a lot of spam has been coming through this list is one thing. That the list daemon threatens to cut people from the list whose systems refuse to accept some of the spam is another. Might I suggest a simple category of

Re: Please /dev/null html-only mail rather than sending it out on this list

2004-04-19 Thread Alexander Lyamin
Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 09:18:39AM +0200, Hendrik Visage wrote: On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 11:58:08PM -0700, The Amazing Dragon wrote: Most servers get patches to fix security holes. SpamAssassin gets patches to spam holes. Both are annoying. Or get DSPAM that the users train and the SysAdmin

Re: Please /dev/null html-only mail rather than sending it out on this list

2004-04-19 Thread Cami
On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 11:58:08PM -0700, The Amazing Dragon wrote: Most servers get patches to fix security holes. SpamAssassin gets patches to spam holes. Both are annoying. Or get DSPAM that the users train and the SysAdmin can got fix security holes ;^) oh... actually i found out that

Re: Please /dev/null html-only mail rather than sending it out on this list

2004-04-19 Thread Alex Zarochentsev
On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 03:45:51PM +0400, Alexander Lyamin wrote: Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 05:45:04PM -0400, Pierre Abbat wrote: On Sunday 18 April 2004 17:26, Whit Blauvelt wrote: Hi, :0 B * H ?? Content-Type: multipart * Content-Type: text/html * ! Content-Type: text/plain * !

Please /dev/null html-only mail rather than sending it out on this list

2004-04-18 Thread Whit Blauvelt
Hi, That a lot of spam has been coming through this list is one thing. That the list daemon threatens to cut people from the list whose systems refuse to accept some of the spam is another. Might I suggest a simple category of stuff to throw out before forwarding to the list: HTML-only mail.

Re: Please /dev/null html-only mail rather than sending it out on this list

2004-04-18 Thread Pierre Abbat
On Sunday 18 April 2004 17:26, Whit Blauvelt wrote: Hi, That a lot of spam has been coming through this list is one thing. That the list daemon threatens to cut people from the list whose systems refuse to accept some of the spam is another. Might I suggest a simple category of stuff to