Too bad it took a few brave college students to do what responsible
academics (including many on this list) have failed to do for years...
http://www.timesdispatch.com/news/latest-news-ap/lgbt-activists-take-u-va-professor-to-task-for-stance/article_fa5680ce-e36e-11e3-a4ed-0017a43b2370.html
-
Law of '97
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Hillel Y. Levin hillelle...@gmail.comwrote:
I don't agree with Doug's views on these issues, but this is an obscene
witch hunt.
On Sunday, May 25, 2014, jim green ugala...@gmail.com wrote:
Too bad it took a few brave college students to do what
deserves attention.
But perhaps not for the same reasons that you do.
Respectfully,
Paul Horwitz
Sent from my iPad
On May 25, 2014, at 5:42 PM, jim green ugala...@gmail.com wrote:
Too bad it took a few brave college students to do what responsible
academics (including many on this list) have
:24 PM, jim green ugala...@gmail.com wrote:
I see Horowitz is fast out of the gate defending Laycock as usual. I have
responded ad nauseum to you in your comments section of your blog but as
usual you deflect with a slew of questions as if I were your student in
some parody of The Paper Chase
This list is primarily a vehicle for academic self-promotion so drop the
sanctimony Volokh...
---Jimmy green
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 7:27 PM, jim green ugala...@gmail.com wrote:
Is this the same Eugene Volokh who is obsessed with gay men converting
him? The same one who supported ex-gay
gay, or not living up to your high standards of what a “1st tier law
professor” would be.
Eugene Volokh
*From:* religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu [mailto:
religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] *On Behalf Of *jim green
*Sent:* Sunday, May 25, 2014 4:27 PM
*To:* Law
I find it very disturbing that Laycock, et. al. basically acted as cheer
leaders for a bill they knew was controversial, to say the least, among
their fellow scholars. The analysis proffered to the legislature did not
mention the potential non-discrimination hazards at all - that issue was
Senate Majority Leader Terry Bruce, R-Hutchinson, asked Scarberry about
whether legal protections for the LGBT community would conflict with
religious freedom protections.
Read more here:
http://www.kansas.com/2014/03/06/3329020/senate-judiciary-committee-reviews.html#storylink=cpy
Scarberry said
Interesting political intervention from a group of list members who
describe themselves as:
*Some of us are Republicans; some of us are Democrats. Some of us are
religious; some of us are not. Some of us oppose same-sex marriage; some of
us support it. Nine of the eleven signers of this letter
So the answer to discrimination against gays lesbians is for them to go
back into closet! All of these queers mincing around looking for a lawsuit
- you've busted us.
I suppose I could play the rhetorical games and have you replace gay with
christian or explain how heterosexuals flaunt their
Excellent article in the Guardian about a huge row that has erupted in
Ireland over homophobia that addresses some of the same concerns raised on
this list - who gets to decide what constitutes homophobia, how did the
focus shifted away from the harm done to gay people by discrimination to
the
In most of the country, none of your fevered speculation would matter
because conservatives, including several academics on this list, have
opposed extending non-discrimination laws to include sexuality, much less
gender identity (or if they would so cobble such protections with large
carve outs
So you delete me but not Mr. Linden...why should I expect anything else
from you Mark...
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Scarberry, Mark
mark.scarbe...@pepperdine.edu wrote:
Further posts from Mr. Green will be deleted unread.
Mark S. Scarberry
Pepperdine University School of Law
Sent
It must be nice to live in Professor's Laycock's world where anti-gay
discrimination has been eclipsed by anti-religious bigotry but as a gay
man, I don't have the that luxury. I won't waste the lists time by
pointing out the blinding privilege it takes to make such a comparison but
it happens
14 matches
Mail list logo
