9:17 AM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: A right not to be compelled to create expression?
Eugene invokes Wooley to make the following comparison:
If Maynard can't be required to carry the motto 'Live Free or Die' on his car,
then a Maynard who is a generally will-take-most
or photographer would still be creating the expression herself,
using her own artistic and literary creative judgment.
The question, then, is: Should people have a right not to
be compelled to create expression they think is wrong, just as they have a
right not to be compelled
her own
artistic and literary creative judgment.
The question, then, is: Should people have a right not to
be compelled to create expression they think is wrong, just as they have a
right not to be compelled to distribute expression they think is wrong? It
seems to me
: A right not to be compelled to create expression?
I'm pretty sure that Eugene is correct--freelance wedding photographs
are generally protected under the category of pictorial, graphic, or
sculptural works, and as such are not eligible to be works for hire.
(Photographs submitted to magazines
, 2013 12:33:30 PM
Subject: Re: A right not to be compelled to create expression?
I'm pretty sure that Eugene is correct--freelance wedding photographs
are generally protected under the category of pictorial, graphic, or
sculptural works, and as such are not eligible to be works for hire
: A right not to be compelled to create expression?
We've wandered far from religion -- but that is very wrong, Z.
You own the copies -- the specific photos that you purchased. And if you
photographer gave you negatives (in the old days) or a CD with electronic
versions you can copy or print
religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Sent: Sunday, August 25, 2013 2:06:55 PM
Subject: Re: A right not to be compelled to create expression?
We've wandered far from religion -- but that is very wrong, Z.
You own the copies -- the specific photos that you purchased. And if you
photographer gave you
)
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Subject: Re: A right not to be compelled to create expression?
You may be pretty sure, but I'm absolutely certain that the photos I purchased
from our wedding photographer, as well as all school and graduation photos, are
owned
the obvious Dickensian reference.
Thanks for your patience.
-Z
- Original Message -
From: Mark Scarberry mark.scarbe...@pepperdine.edu
To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Sent: Sunday, August 25, 2013 6:11:09 PM
Subject: Re: A right not to be compelled to create expression?
My wife tells
, then, is: Should people have a right not to be
compelled to create expression they think is wrong, just as they have a right
not to be compelled to distribute expression they think is wrong? It seems to
me that the logic of Wooley should extend equally to both rights. If Maynard
can't be required to carry
artistic and literary creative judgment.
The question, then, is: Should people have a right not to be
compelled to create expression they think is wrong, just as they have a right
not to be compelled to distribute expression they think is wrong? It seems
to me that the logic
: Law Religion issues for Law Academics religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Subject: Re: A right not to be compelled to create expression?
Point of law-- Most freelancers are subject to work for hire agreements that
divest copyright and make the purchaser the owner of the speech for all
purposes.
Marci
Original message
From: Gaubatz, Derek dgaub...@imb.org
Date: 08/24/2013 10:57 AM (GMT-08:00)
To: 'religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu' religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Subject: Re: A right not to be compelled to create expression?
Actually, the creator is the copyright owner of the work unless
@lists.ucla.edu
Sent: Saturday, August 24, 2013 2:23:51 PM
Subject: Re: A right not to be compelled to create expression?
Professional photographers generally retain copyright to graduation photos,
wedding photos, etc., so you have to go back to them for additional prints. At
least that's my
...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Marci Hamilton
Sent: Saturday, August 24, 2013 10:26 AM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Cc: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: A right not to be compelled to create expression?
Point of law
: A right not to be compelled to create expression?
Point of law-- Most freelancers are subject to work for hire agreements that
divest copyright and make the purchaser the owner of the speech for all
purposes.
Marci A. Hamilton
Verkuil Chair in Public Law
Benjamin N. Cardozo Law School
16 matches
Mail list logo
