: RE: May court decide whether religious arbitration procedures were
followed
Dear All,
First, thanks to Rick for passing this thread along to me and I’m pleased to
have joined the listserv.
I had a couple of initial reactions to the case:
(1)If this were not an arbitration before
Not only was the headline misleading, but my subject line was
grammatically appalling! I've tried to correct it; my apologies as to that.
I agree that it sounds like the judge wasn't ordering the use of
Islamic law in the first instance, but it sounds like the
, VA 22903
434-243-8546
From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Volokh, Eugene
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 12:11 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: May court decide whether religious arbitration procedures
Religion issues for Law Academics'
Subject: RE: May court decide whether religious arbitration procedures were
followed
Serbian Eastern v. Milivojevich holds that civil courts cannot decide whether
religious courts followed their own procedures. Removing a bishop is an
especially sensitive context
