for Law Academics
Subject: RE: New circumcision policy statement from the AAP
Eugene --
I have to respectfully continue to disagree with your approach to this issue,
as well as your assessment of the effect of the AAP decision on your
argument:
Previously I think you had offered both
...@law.ucla.edu]
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 7:48 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: New circumcision policy statement from the AAP
I don’t think it changes my analysis, since I’ve all along
acknowledged that there are plausible medical arguments in favor
[religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu]
on behalf of Volokh, Eugene [vol...@law.ucla.edu]
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 10:01 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: New circumcision policy statement from the AAP
The question is why, in the first place, people should
I don't think it changes my analysis, since I've all along
acknowledged that there are plausible medical arguments in favor of
circumcision. I'm hesitant to treat the AAP statement as materially changing
that, since I take it that there's some disagreement among pediatric groups -
With appreciation to Eric and especially to Eugene for pushing us to think
carefully about the right legal rule regarding circumcision, I wonder if
focusing on even more fundamental considerations can clarify even more.
As I see it, we do not delegate the authority to parents to make decisions
, Kevin
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 5:35 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Cc: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: New circumcision policy statement from the AAP
With appreciation to Eric and especially to Eugene for pushing us to think
carefully about the right legal
