I think Eugene is
absolutely right, and so I ask his indulgence regarding this post. I
simply want to point out that the nature of religious belief--its
intelligibility or unintelligibility, circularity ornoncircularity, and
whether it can explain the problem of evil and suffering--is
Amen!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think Eugene is absolutely right, and so I ask his indulgence
regarding this post. I simply want to point out that the nature of religious
belief--its intelligibility or unintelligibility, circularity ornoncircularity,
and whether it can
Title: Re: evangelize
Would it be appropriate of me to say that Bobbys comments about evangelism are good news? :-)
Frank
On 2/27/05 9:16 AM, Paul Finkelman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Amen!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think Eugene is absolutely right, and so I ask his indulgence regarding
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So be it, but it is
important, I believe to be reminded of the ONLY reason we Christians
ought to be followers of Jesus the Christ, and that reason is to
evangelize the lost. I do not find that declaration offensive in this
venue or any other.
To everything there is
Title: Message
I don't find it
offensive because of its content -- but it's not allowed in this venue.
Imagine that this were a mathematicians' convention, and people were talking
about math, and someone got up and started to evangelize. That would be
inappropriate, because off-topic. So
I have received a couple of private e-mails on my post, suggesting that I
over reacted to the first evangelical post. So let me explain my posting.
I did not see the evangeglical posting as a mistake. The second posting
of Mr. Ingle reaffirms my view of this.
Anyone who is on this list
Title: Message
Folks: Perhaps I'm mistaken, but I think
this discussion is getting to be as off-topic as the post that prompted
it.
Eugene
___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get
