.
From: David E. Guinn
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006
9:41 PM
To: Law
Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: Pilgrim Baptist
Church
You wrote:
Nevertheless, even if the sort of
formal neutrality rule espoused in Thomas's Mitchell
plurality
Doesn't Boerne answer the question posed in your second paragraph?
-Original Message-
From: Volokh, Eugene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 11:59 AM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Pilgrim Baptist Church
Marty makes an excellent point
that Illinois is somehow
ill-motivated here.
Eugene
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Newsom MichaelSent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006
10:13 AMTo: Law Religion issues for Law
AcademicsSubject: RE: Pilgrim Baptist Church
, 2006 10:18 AM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Pilgrim Baptist Church
Doesn't Boerne answer the question posed in your second paragraph?
-Original Message-
From: Volokh, Eugene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 11:59 AM
To: Law
: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 1:26 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Pilgrim Baptist Church
I'm not sure I quite understand -- why would it answer that
question? If I recall correctly, this issue wasn't passed on by the
Court.
Eugene
-Original Message
: Pilgrim Baptist Church
I don't think Boerne can be read as even implicitly passing on
this question. But if courts do end up rejecting these objections to
landmarking, then my point (a response to Marty's point about
neutrality) is that the same should apply to objections to government
repair
Of
Newsom Michael
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 10:52 AM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Pilgrim Baptist Church
I don't think that your analogy holds up. It is one thing
for the state to regulate, and quite another to spend money.
-Original Message-
From
on.
-Original Message-
From: Volokh, Eugene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 2:24 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Pilgrim Baptist Church
Of course the two are in a sense different things. But they're
also similar in that (1) they are both
that fact and move on.
-Original Message-
From: Volokh, Eugene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 2:24 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Pilgrim Baptist Church
Of course the two are in a sense different things. But
they're
: Pilgrim Baptist Church
Marty makes an excellent point here. I think (though I'm not sure
that Marty does) that it would be outrageous if, when a state *does*
rebuild all buildings, or help rebuild them, or provides other services
short of rebuilding (e.g., taxpayer-paid internal sprinkler
a message dated 1/15/2006 3:56:48 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I trust
that many members of the list may have heard about the tragic fire at the
Pilgrim Baptist Church. The church, designed by the firm of Adler
and Sullivan, started life as a major synacoge on the Sout
eutrality" rule espoused in
Thomas's Mitchell plurality becomes the governing doctrine, as I think
it will, these cases are still difficult, because there's nothing neutral, or
objective, about the decision to fund the rebuilding of the Pilgrim Baptist
Church. Illinois presumably does not r
rebuilding of the Pilgrim Baptist
Church. Illinois presumably does not rebuild all buildings destroyed by
fire, or all "community services" buildings, or all churches, for that
matter. The decision to rebuild this particular structure is very
subjective, and discretionary. I s
--- Original Message -
From:
David
E. Guinn
To: Law Religion issues for Law
Academics
Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 9:40
PM
Subject: Re: Pilgrim Baptist Church
You wrote:
Nevertheless, even if the sort of "formal neutrality" rule espoused in
Thoma
Academics
Subject: Pilgrim Baptist Church
I trust that many members of the list may have heard about the tragic fire
at the Pilgrim Baptist Church. The church, designed by the firm of Adler
and Sullivan, started life as a major synacoge on the South side of Chicago
that was eventually taken
15 matches
Mail list logo
