I wonder if the reverse argument has more power. That is: if a church declares
that the sacrament of marriage is available to *any* couple willing to accept
it, does the minister of that church have a free exercise right *to perform*
that marriage ceremony?
--
Paul Finkelman
Chapman
On Mar 15, 2005, at 9:56 AM, Paul Finkelman wrote:
I wonder if the reverse argument has more power. That is: if a
church declares that the sacrament of marriage is available to *any*
couple willing to accept it, does the minister of that church have a
free exercise right *to perform* that
for Law AcademicsSubject:
Rights of clergy regarding same-sex marriage? -- a free exercise
right?
I
wonder if the reverse argument has more power. That is: if a
church declares that the sacrament of marriage is available to *any* couple
willing to accept it, does the minister of that church
