Re: [Repeater-Builder] new member introduction

2010-08-15 Thread ZephyrNYC
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 20:32, Nate Duehr n...@natetech.com wrote: Very little, typically. Almost all have solid-state components that would be utterly dead after an EMP. Tube gear that survives EMP better is virtually all gone. And user radios are required for any repeater to be useful,

Re: [Repeater-Builder] new member introduction

2010-08-15 Thread STeve Andre'
On Sunday 15 August 2010 02:27:17 ZephyrNYC wrote: On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 20:32, Nate Duehr n...@natetech.com wrote: Very little, typically. Almost all have solid-state components that would be utterly dead after an EMP. Tube gear that survives EMP better is virtually all gone. And user

Re: [Repeater-Builder] new member introduction

2010-08-14 Thread Nate Duehr
On Aug 12, 2010, at 9:09 PM, Zephyr wrote: Thanks for having me in your group. I am a long-time military veteran and a paramedic. I hope to learn a lot from the group. One of the reasons I joined the group is to find out what kind of EMP hardening is considered when designing and building