Hello Eric,
Thank you for reply. I used the Non Four Line Display Radio firmware and all
of my programming stuff are original from Motorola, RIB, cable and Flash
interface
Ive start the process and the programming software stop and ask me to do
not click on cancel to return to the
This whole thread about ACSSB legality reminds me of read it again regarding
TV channel 7 digital conversions of a few months ago.
-- Original Message --
Received: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 07:47:54 AM PST
From: wd8chl wd8...@gmail.com
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re:
Interesting thing about part 97. It is written differently than any other part
of the rules. In most of the rules they tell you what you can do and if it
isn't specifically spelled out then you can't do it.
In part 97 it is the other way around. For the most part they tell you what you
can't
Eric,
I am not aware of any means to clean the memory. If you send the radio to
Motorola's repair depot, it will come back with a brand-new chassis- a new
radio in an old case- with the latest firmware installed. Of course, you
must have the most recent version of CPS to program it. It is
Agreed Rob.
ACSSB is nothing more than regular old SSB with a few things added. The
compandering is simply speech compression on the transmit end and an
equivalent expansion on the receive end to restore the dynamic range of the
voice. This gives some noise reduction in the circuit.
As
To some extent, ACSSB was simply the worst of all worlds,
like NBFM with more ignition noise and companding artifacts,
or SSB but restricted to channels. It made sense on paper as
an analog bandwidth conservation tool compared to NBFM, but
sounded really bad in areas of marginal
Fellows,
I'm on a quest for Minitor II tone filters(KLN7834) for a loal FD. I
have a request for CB(371.5) LB(822.2) tones. They'd like to have at
least 10 sets. PLEASE check your junk boxes and other stashes and let me
know what you have.
Thanks,
Scott
--
Scott Zimmerman
Amateur Radio
Scott, check out http://www.mdmradio.com/
You know Lefty
You know Lefty also check Here
http://www.gcomradio.com/
PS The custom Made by You 220 Repeater is still working Great
Good Luck
Don KA9QJG
Fellows,
I'm on a quest for Minitor
Looking for some ones input on nuc and quantar interchangability. I want to
know if the back plane in a paging nuc will allow a quantar controller
to plug in and work the same as a quantar backplane, such that a p-25 repeater
can be achieved. I have five nuc's sitting and want to make quantars
Looking for some ones input on nuc and quantar interchangability. I want to
know if the back plane in a paging nuc will allow a quantar controller
to plug in and work the same as a quantar backplane, such that a p-25 repeater
can be achieved. I have five nuc's sitting and want to make quantars
If you find out before I do, I would love to know. I have not had the
time to mess around with my nuke, but I do have some Quantar control
boards that could be guinea pigged for the purpose. I would be most
concerned about the PA working with it as the Quantar control system
knows the little
Dear friend,
How are you doing recently?
I found a good website last week: www.etstrade.com.
They do internationa business and they sell different kinds of electronic
products. Such as laptops, digital cameras, phones, notebooks and so on. Their
products are new and original and have 3 years
Nothing in the rules will state ACSSB is not allowed or ACSSB is allowed.
The rules give the technical parameters for signals on a band. Any more that
meets those technical parameters - and is publicly documented - is permitted.
ACSSB would seem to meet those requirements.
73
Dan
Hi guys .I have a maxon stand alone programmer and I have some sm4450 NE,SD
and I have tried to program the eproms with two frequencies .one 507 with no
problems and one with 517megs and it comes up with frequency max error .does
anyone know thee password to access the parameters to charge the
Butch Kanvick wrote:
Dear friend,
Measures have been taken so this won't happen again - from this member.
Kevin Custer
List Owner
At least you're more on the ball about taking care of spammers than other
yahoo! lists I'm on...
Thank you sir for the wonderful service.
-Brian / KF4ZWZ
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Kevin Custer kug...@kuggie.com wrote:
Butch Kanvick wrote:
Dear friend,
Measures have been taken so
Oh, great wise wizards of radio land...
As the subject line says. Changed mics, adjusted deviation and mic
gain settings. Also used test mode. Audio including PL and
signalling is less than a tenth KHz deviation.
Common problem? Ready solution? I know about the time bomb caps - is
this a typical
duh-because when repeaters were first authorized for 2M, they were only
allowed from 146 to 148. 144.5-145.5 didn't come into existence until
the 80's.
Close, but not exactly. When repeaters first came to be used on the ham bands
in the late '50s/early '60s the 2m band from 144 to 148 Mc was
another interesting thing would be to see 2 meter repeaters go to 2 or 3 mhz
splits and employ some form of efficient modulation mode instead of the same
old 10 khz fm.
Actually, it's happening now. There's a very dedicated (and, apparently, very
wealthy) group of hams using the Public Safety
I believe the OP is essentially correct. The 2M sub-band didn't come
until much later - I was thinking it was the late 70s, but it could have
been the early 80s.
Your point was why the 146 MHz pairs were more popular - because the
techs could not use the 147 MHz pairs.
The 146 MHz segment was
Oh, my point was that the techs had access to the entire 2M band before
there were repeaters in the sub-band (144.5 - 145.5 MHz), so the
sub-band had no impact on the techs, or vice versa.
I remember when the sub-band was the black sheep of the 2M band.
Joe M.
MCH wrote:
I believe the OP is
21 matches
Mail list logo
