Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13096
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13163#issuecomment-220523618
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13096#issuecomment-220523585
Alright I'm going to merge this in master/2.0. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13163#issuecomment-220523617
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13045#discussion_r63994025
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Column.scala ---
@@ -37,6 +38,14 @@ private[sql] object Column {
def apply(expr:
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13163#issuecomment-220523513
**[Test build #58937 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58937/consoleFull)**
for PR 13163 at commit
Github user xwu0226 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13212#issuecomment-220523283
@rxin Updated the code. Please help double check. Thank you very much!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user hvanhovell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13170#issuecomment-220523237
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user wangyang1992 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13169#issuecomment-220523060
Addressed your comments. @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13181#issuecomment-220522607
@marmbrus I tested and could produce the exceptions for reading in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-15393 but it seems this might not
be the reason.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12979#issuecomment-220522052
**[Test build #58945 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58945/consoleFull)**
for PR 12979 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13078#issuecomment-220521732
@srowen we should backport the doc fixes into branch-2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user xwu0226 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12984#issuecomment-220521657
@cloud-fan Please see if we should add these test cases to 2.0 branch. It
is related to the distinct aggregate in having clause. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13200#discussion_r63993278
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SparkSession.scala
---
@@ -735,29 +731,130 @@ object SparkSession {
}
/**
Github user sun-rui commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13165#issuecomment-220521666
1. A rough scan of the test failures shows most of them are probably
related to path handling. You can replay the failed test case in R on Windows.
For debug
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13159#issuecomment-220521612
@MLnick did you actually merge this in 2.0?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12979#issuecomment-220521459
**[Test build #58944 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58944/consoleFull)**
for PR 12979 at commit
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13200#discussion_r63993145
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SparkSession.scala
---
@@ -735,29 +731,130 @@ object SparkSession {
}
/**
-
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13188#discussion_r63993020
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/benchmark/tpcds/TPCDSQueryBenchmark.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13096#issuecomment-220521107
LGTM, thanks for finding this bug!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12839#issuecomment-220521039
Since this is very low risk, I'm going to cherry-pick this in branch-2.0
too to minimize the diff.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13096#discussion_r63992991
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -1560,7 +1561,14 @@ object EmbedSerializerInFilter
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13090#issuecomment-220520673
LGTM except one style comment, thanks for working on it!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13090#discussion_r63992806
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/encoders/RowEncoder.scala
---
@@ -149,12 +149,12 @@ object RowEncoder {
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13200#discussion_r63992730
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SparkSession.scala
---
@@ -735,29 +731,130 @@ object SparkSession {
}
/**
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12932
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12932#issuecomment-220519882
I'm going to merge this in master/2.0/1.6. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13214#issuecomment-220519810
**[Test build #58943 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58943/consoleFull)**
for PR 13214 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13087#discussion_r63992511
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -1025,7 +1025,8 @@ object PushDownPredicate extends
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13096#issuecomment-220519361
cc @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13207#issuecomment-220519275
**[Test build #58942 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58942/consoleFull)**
for PR 13207 at commit
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13188#discussion_r63992275
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/benchmark/tpcds/TPCDSQueryBenchmark.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13214
[SPARK-15433][PySpark] PySpark core test should not use SerDe from
PythonMLLibAPI
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently PySpark core test uses the `SerDe` from
Github user xwu0226 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13212#discussion_r63992232
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -1387,6 +1387,27 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends
Logging with
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13188#discussion_r63992224
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/benchmark/tpcds/TPCDSQueryBenchmark.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13213#issuecomment-220519177
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12768
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13213#issuecomment-220519176
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13213#issuecomment-220519138
**[Test build #58941 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58941/consoleFull)**
for PR 13213 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13208
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13212#discussion_r63992144
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -1387,6 +1387,27 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends
Logging with
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13188#discussion_r63992090
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/benchmark/tpcds/TPCDSQueryBenchmark.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user xwu0226 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13212#discussion_r63992055
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -1387,6 +1387,27 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends
Logging with
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13208#issuecomment-220518940
Merging in master/2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13045#discussion_r63992015
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Column.scala ---
@@ -37,6 +38,14 @@ private[sql] object Column {
def apply(expr:
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13208#issuecomment-220518610
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13213#issuecomment-220518293
**[Test build #58941 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58941/consoleFull)**
for PR 13213 at commit
GitHub user wangmiao1981 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13213
[SPARK-15363][ML][Example]:Example code shouldn't use VectorImplicits._,
asML/fromML
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13169#issuecomment-220518098
LGTM, except some minor comment, thanks for working on it!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13169#discussion_r63991642
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/DateTimeUtilsSuite.scala
---
@@ -353,6 +353,20 @@ class DateTimeUtilsSuite
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13045#discussion_r63991554
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DatasetAggregatorSuite.scala ---
@@ -240,4 +240,15 @@ class DatasetAggregatorSuite extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13210#issuecomment-220517869
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13210#issuecomment-220517868
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13210#issuecomment-220517778
**[Test build #58936 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58936/consoleFull)**
for PR 13210 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13169#discussion_r63991470
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/DateTimeUtils.scala
---
@@ -426,6 +426,26 @@ object DateTimeUtils {
}
Github user xwu0226 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13212#discussion_r63991418
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/resources.scala
---
@@ -46,3 +46,33 @@ case class AddFile(path: String) extends
Github user xwu0226 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13212#discussion_r63991451
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -1387,6 +1387,27 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends
Logging with
Github user xwu0226 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13212#discussion_r63991431
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/resources.scala
---
@@ -46,3 +46,33 @@ case class AddFile(path: String) extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13156#issuecomment-220517365
**[Test build #58940 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58940/consoleFull)**
for PR 13156 at commit
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13212#discussion_r63991280
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -1387,6 +1387,27 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends
Logging with
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13212#discussion_r63991284
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -1724,6 +1745,22 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends
Logging with
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13045#discussion_r63991309
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Column.scala ---
@@ -37,6 +38,14 @@ private[sql] object Column {
def apply(expr: Expression):
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13045#discussion_r63991215
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DatasetAggregatorSuite.scala ---
@@ -240,4 +240,15 @@ class DatasetAggregatorSuite extends
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13212#discussion_r63991184
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/resources.scala
---
@@ -46,3 +46,33 @@ case class AddFile(path: String) extends
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13212#discussion_r63991179
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/resources.scala
---
@@ -46,3 +46,33 @@ case class AddFile(path: String) extends
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13200
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13045#discussion_r63991134
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/unresolved.scala
---
@@ -325,10 +325,13 @@ case class
Github user xwu0226 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13088#issuecomment-220516958
@rxin @yhuai @andrewor14 Please help check if the updated change is in the
right direction, Thank you very much!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13200#issuecomment-220516955
Thanks - merging in master/2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13156#issuecomment-220516949
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13045#discussion_r63991063
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -174,14 +174,16 @@ class Analyzer(
private
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13096#issuecomment-220516852
Can you add the jira ticket somewhere as inline comment in the test case
and in the analyzer code?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13200#issuecomment-220516804
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13200#issuecomment-220516531
@marmbrus i know you were looking at this. Did you end up going through it?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user xwu0226 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13212#issuecomment-220516455
cc @yhuai @hvanhovell @gatorsmile Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13212#issuecomment-220516397
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10125#issuecomment-220516202
thanks, merging to master and 2.0!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10125
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13200#issuecomment-220515969
**[Test build #58939 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58939/consoleFull)**
for PR 13200 at commit
GitHub user xwu0226 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13212
[SPARK-15431][SQL] Support LIST FILE(s)|JAR(s) command natively
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently command "ADD FILE|JAR " is supported natively
in
Github user dilipbiswal commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13045#issuecomment-220515698
cc @cloud-fan Hi Wenchen, I have made the changes per your comments. Could
you please look through it when you get a chance ? Thanks..
---
If your project is set
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13156#issuecomment-220515502
LGTM, pending jenkins
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13209#discussion_r63990349
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -348,6 +348,11 @@ object SQLConf {
.booleanConf
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13165#issuecomment-220515342
This raises some questions to me.
1. It seems several tests were failed. Could you please inform me your
thoughts?
2. Now, I think I can add some
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13165#issuecomment-220515182
@sun-rui @felixcheung Right. It seems finally I made it. I made gists and
upload a PDF file for Spark UI.
Let me tell you the test results first.
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13108
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13108#issuecomment-220514860
LGTM, merging to master and 2.0, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13211#issuecomment-220514553
**[Test build #58938 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58938/consoleFull)**
for PR 13211 at commit
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13211
[SPARK-15430][SQL] Fix potential ConcurrentModificationException for
ListAccumulator
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In `ListAccumulator` we create an unmodifiable view
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13156#issuecomment-220513843
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user GayathriMurali commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13176#issuecomment-220513197
@hhbyyh Can you please help review this? I will resolve the branch conflict
along with review comments
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user wangyang1992 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13169#issuecomment-220512727
@cloud-fan Could you please help me look at this some time? A simple fix.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13163#issuecomment-220512285
**[Test build #58937 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58937/consoleFull)**
for PR 13163 at commit
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13163#discussion_r63988573
--- Diff:
launcher/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/launcher/SparkSubmitCommandBuilderSuite.java
---
@@ -59,6 +59,18 @@ public void
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13108#issuecomment-220511906
**[Test build #2999 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2999/consoleFull)**
for PR 13108 at commit
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13210#issuecomment-220511611
cc @marmbrus
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13170#issuecomment-220511333
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13170#issuecomment-220511331
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13210#discussion_r63988111
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/UnsupportedOperationChecker.scala
---
@@ -55,10 +55,19 @@ object
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13170#issuecomment-220511206
**[Test build #58935 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58935/consoleFull)**
for PR 13170 at commit
1 - 100 of 811 matches
Mail list logo