As I understand it, 2.6.39uek = 3.0.16. The versioning is for their
tool compatibility, even though it should be 2.6.40.16 under the
commonly accepted versioning for 2.6.x IIRC. And allegedly Xen went
upstream early in 3.x. Was it 3.0.3? Or was that 3.3?
I think it was in 3.0. But it
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 4:55 AM, Nuno Fernandes npf-mli...@eurotux.com wrote:
Hello,
I have a server with centos5 installed and 2.6.18-308.4.1.el5xen kernel with
the following modules ...
The important part is the mptsas module that is being used because of the
...
local disc of the server
On Thursday 30 August 2012 06:25:52 Bryan J Smith wrote:
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 4:55 AM, Nuno Fernandes npf-mli...@eurotux.com
wrote:
Hello,
I have a server with centos5 installed and 2.6.18-308.4.1.el5xen kernel
with the following modules ...
The important part is the mptsas module
Nuno Fernandes npf-mli...@eurotux.com wrote:
Yes.. that coud happen.
Maybe I should step back ...
What are your _requirements_? I.e., what is driving you to do this?
What is preventing you from going with an actual, full EL6 platform
(with the Red Hat 2.6.32 kABI) instead of attempting to
On 08/30/2012 12:51 PM, Bryan J Smith wrote:
Nuno Fernandes npf-mli...@eurotux.com wrote:
Yes.. that coud happen.
Maybe I should step back ...
What are your _requirements_? I.e., what is driving you to do this?
What is preventing you from going with an actual, full EL6 platform
(with the
Since you're playing with third-party kernels on top of RHEL 5, why not try the
ones from ELRepo? I've used their kernels on a RHEL 6 system to get
bleeding-edge USB 3.0 support and they've been great on two systems (nothing
production). I've not used their kernels for RHEL 5 (which have a
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 8:20 AM, Nuno Fernandes npf-mli...@eurotux.com wrote:
Let me then start from the beginning... We are creating an opensource
virtualization solution called Nuxis (http://nuxis.com/). This solution is
based on Centos5 + some of our packages (mostly web interface and
On 08/30/2012 01:49 PM, Bryan J Smith wrote:
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 8:20 AM, Nuno Fernandes npf-mli...@eurotux.com wrote:
Let me then start from the beginning... We are creating an opensource
virtualization solution called Nuxis (http://nuxis.com/). This solution is
based on Centos5 + some of
On 08/30/2012 01:41 PM, Brian Long wrote:
Since you're playing with third-party kernels on top of RHEL 5, why not try the
ones from ELRepo? I've used their kernels on a RHEL 6 system to get
bleeding-edge USB 3.0 support and they've been great on two systems (nothing
production). I've not
That kernel works and it boots fine without xen. With xen it panics
because it doesn't have support for Dom0:
shell$ grep CONFIG_XEN /boot/config-3.0.42-1.el5.elrepo
# CONFIG_XEN is not set
# CONFIG_XEN_PRIVILEGED_GUEST is not set
Argh!!
3.0 kernel lacks some xen backend drivers needed by
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Nuno Fernandes npf-mli...@eurotux.com wrote:
Argh!!
3.0 kernel lacks some xen backend drivers needed by full dom0 support.
kernel-2.6.39uek has backported those drivers because of their oracleVM
product that uses the same kernel.
Back to debug mode :(
As I
11 matches
Mail list logo
