Re: [rhelv5-list] Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.3 GA Announcement / Release notes samba version wrong

2009-01-21 Thread Pasi Kärkkäinen
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 03:57:21PM -0500, rhelv5-list@redhat.com wrote: * Windows Interoperability + Rebased samba from 3.0.28 to 3.0.32 which supports Windows Vista and 2008 and various fixes for DC functionality (interoperability with Citrix and Domain trusts) Release notes seem

Re: [rhelv5-list] no more 64 httpd in 5.3?

2009-01-21 Thread Jay Turner
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 17:50 -0600, greg_sw...@aotx.uscourts.gov wrote: [snip] In Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.2, a 64-bit version of *httpd* was included in this architecture in addition to the existing 32-bit *httpd*. If a user installed both versions, an *httpd* conflict would occur,

Re: [rhelv5-list] gnome-session takes 20+ seconds to display the background and load when using nss_db vs 2 seconds with /etc/passwd

2009-01-21 Thread Jason Edgecombe
Deke Clinger wrote: Old thread, but did you check to make sure that AFS is started before gdm? This is suggestive: file:///afs/deleted/trng02/linux/.gnome2/panel2.d/default/launchers/blah-003f483c8b.desktop for panel launcher: No such file or directory Sometimes there's some

Re: [rhelv5-list] no more 64 httpd in 5.3?

2009-01-21 Thread Greg_Swift
In Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.2, a 64-bit version of *httpd* was included in this architecture in addition to the existing 32-bit *httpd*. If a user installed both versions, an *httpd* conflict would occur, preventing *httpd* from functioning properly. To resolve this issue, the

Re: [rhelv5-list] Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.3 GA Announcement / Release notes samba version wrong

2009-01-21 Thread Rainer Traut
Am 21.01.2009 09:15, schrieb Pasi Kärkkäinen: On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 03:57:21PM -0500, rhelv5-list@redhat.com wrote: * Windows Interoperability + Rebased samba from 3.0.28 to 3.0.32 which supports Windows Vista and 2008 and various fixes for DC functionality (interoperability with

Re: [rhelv5-list] RHEL 5.3 and ISOs on RHN

2009-01-21 Thread Joshua Daniel Franklin
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: I basically put the couple of days after a release to be 'dead' space and if its important enough for my 'customers' not to have that problem I budget in a satellite. Sometimes they will do it.. and sometimes they won't. I can see

Re: [rhelv5-list] RHEL 5.3 and ISOs on RHN

2009-01-21 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Joshua Daniel Franklin jdf.li...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: I basically put the couple of days after a release to be 'dead' space and if its important enough for my 'customers' not to have that problem I

[rhelv5-list] yum update with filesystem rpm and NFS mounted /home

2009-01-21 Thread akrherz
Howdy, I have a NFS mounted /home filesystem and I notice the new RHEL5.3 filesystem RPM will bomb out on install. Yum doesn't notice this error and will say all things finished okey-dokey! :) # yum -y update Loaded plugins: rhnplugin, security Skipping security plugin, no data Setting up

Re: [rhelv5-list] yum update with filesystem rpm and NFS mounted /home

2009-01-21 Thread Olle Eriksson
akrh...@iastate.edu skrev: Howdy, I have a NFS mounted /home filesystem and I notice the new RHEL5.3 filesystem RPM will bomb out on install. Yum doesn't notice this error and will say all things finished okey-dokey! :) # yum -y update Loaded plugins: rhnplugin, security Skipping security

[rhelv5-list] Getting many paths attached to each lun

2009-01-21 Thread Lavannya
Hi, In redhat5.2 , I have 3 luns (symmetrix)  attached to the server. Just after installation  when I checked with 'fdisk -l ' command , found  each  luns are attached to 9 paths.   I dont have any concepts still yet  about  multipath, though multipath rpm is being installed but the daemon